Wrestlemania #21: Batista or Cena?

Which did you like better back then?At the time Batista was the bigger deal and since I wasn’t huge on Smackdown back then, I was liking Batista more.  There’s something cool about a monster that runs through everyone and can’t be stopped.  See also Warrior, Mr.

 

Thoughts?

image_pdfPDFimage_printPrint

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. dX says:

    Batista was/is still better.

  2. Si says:

    Cena, he had a ton of personality and was putting on moments that you knew would be fitting of one of the greats (however most of which was before Mania XX the year between XX and 21 seemed to just be building to the world title)

    Batista on the flip side had very little in the way of personality, hadn’t had a memorable match and showed no reason to care more than the student beating the master in evolution

  3. TheSDQQKidJoe says:

    Batista. But thank God They didn’t put the company on his shoulders. We see now what became of Batista, bashing WWE At every corner. I still think he’s going to come crawling back though.

  4. Wayne says:

    At this point, I liked Batista more than Cena, mainly because of how Batista was built heading into Mania 21.

    • DiscipleofWrestling says:

      Agreed. The build for Batista was well done up to that point. When he turned on Triple H and Flair, it was a cool moment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *