Royal Rumble 2013: By The Book And Still Awesome

You may also like...

53 Responses

  1. Nick B says:

    I don’t have a problem with the Rock becoming the champ. I just think they should have waited till elimination chamber. If the let Punk beat the Rock at the Rumble,it pretty much makes Punk untouchable for the rest of his career. Instead they make Punk look weak as hell by letting him get pinned by the People’s Elbow?!?! At least make him get pinned by the Rock Bottom. This is just one man’s opinion. I am sure I will be ripped apart by everyone here. Haha.

  2. Chrisman says:

    Cena and Taker have never done it at Mania? Christ on a Cow that must happen asap.

    There have been some horror show Rumbles over the years, this one was decent, which makes it good.

    Is Punk v Del Rio a viable feud/Mania option?

    Also, the comments about Rock being the mega-draw fit in with how he won. This is like Hogan v Savage. It’s a great battle, but Hogan goes over superclean and finished with authority. Punks got a looooong way to go in pure drawing terms. Rock needs to be mega strong for Cena/Taker. The Elbow needed to finish it. Buyrates people, Buyrates. This whole reign was set up so Rock could beat him and gain momentum for Mania. Probably.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Punk vs. Del Rio would work I think as a Smackdown title match, but there are a lot of other people that could get that title shot instead.

  3. W.A.R. says:

    You must be a real killer at parties, eh?

  4. Jay H. says:

    Sometimes Predictable is not a bad thing.

  5. matt says:

    How does a solid show get such a high rating for merely being solid? If it did it’s job but had nothing overly spectacular shouldn’t it be more suited to a B and not something in the A range?

    Good read as always.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Not really. Sometimes going with what is expected, which is what this show did, is the right move.

      • matt says:

        I wasn’t trying to say it was too predictable, I could care less if it was predictable as long as it made sense and was satisfying for the viewers. I was just going off the basis where just meeting the requirements for it to be a good show doesn’t necessarily qualify it as being a GREAT show but that may be a clash of opinion that can’t be changed.

  6. Not Jay says:

    BEST! RUMBLE! EVER! A++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  7. Jay H. says:

    I really have no issue with Rock winning with the People’s Elbow. Its not the first time he’s won the Title with it. Good Show overall,the Rumble was fun,both Title Matches were solid,and the Tag Title Match was decent.

  8. Evan says:

    If they’re doing ANYTHING @ 30 it’s gonna be Cena-Taker and (maybe) Rock/Brock.

    HHH ISN’T WRESTLING ANYBODY WITH THAT RIDICULOUS HAIRCUT. Only Taker can pull that shit off. The Summerslam 2012 match was a build up to Lesnar-Taker, NOT HHH-LESNAR II….. If HHH went over, why would anybody wanna see Lesnar-Taker @ 30 anyways ?

    • noahconstrictor says:

      Do you read what you type? Who WOULDN’T want to see Lesnar-Taker at 30? HHH going over Lesnar, in a match that won’t happen, wouldn’t kill Lesnar at all. Lesnar and Taker have some bad blood, as evidenced by the UFC event Taker was interviewed at where he argued with Lesnar. Lesnar was a former UFC champion, and Taker is undefeated at WM. Sounds like a great match that would draw amazingly.

    • ted says:

      Evan says:
      “if they’re doing ANYTHING @ 30 it’s gonna be Cena-Taker and (maybe) Rock/Brock.

      HHH ISN’T WRESTLING ANYBODY WITH THAT RIDICULOUS HAIRCUT. Only Taker can pull that shit off. The Summerslam 2012 match was a build up to Lesnar-Taker, NOT HHH-LESNAR II….. If HHH went over, why the heck would anybody wanna see Lesnar-Taker @ 30 anyways ?”

      You were a little off brother. Instead we got the 3 match series between Lesnar and H that no one wanted to see.

  9. noahconstrictor says:

    I’m laughing at all of the Rock haters. You guys have no idea how big of a draw Rock was for Wrestlemania last year. Do I agree with the booking for it? No, not really. It was too far in advance, and the Elbow hurts Punk’s credibility, but at the end of the day, Rock is, and always will be, a bigger draw than Punk could ever dream. Punk’s reign was amazing while it lasted, but Rock is going to draw at Wrestlemania. At the end of the day, WWE cares about the money. It doesn’t care about the fans or anything else. The Rock give them more money than Punk does. Quit being a smark saying “Punk should have won because he’s a better wrestler”. Maybe he is, maybe he isn’t. But you guys really need to chill out. I agree with KB’s A- 100%. While the matches themselves weren’t the greatest, and the Rumble was below-average, the booking makes perfect sense. It allows Del Rio to move on (hopefully) to a new feud for WM. It makes Cena vs. Rock II. It helps move The Shield forward. It frees Punk up for his rumored match with Lesnar. Instead of bitching about Punk losing, look on the bright side. This is building up to be a great WM.

  10. Evan says:

    He will be. If you can’t see Lesnar-Taker happening from a mile away you’d be blind. That leaves Punk with one thing and one thing only ; The main event. Punk’s character revolves around having that belt.

    • M.R. says:

      I’d actually expect Lesnar-HHH…
      But even if it were Lesnar-Taker, what’s to say Punk doesn’t have a match with someone like Ryback or Sheamus?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I hope not. I’m planning on going to Wrestlemania 30 which might be Lesnar vs. Taker.

  11. SamualDude says:

    Even though it’s obvious that Cena vs Rock is going to be the main event, Would you like it if Punk was added to the match?

  12. LOL – 2 C-, 1 B = A- show?? Really how??

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Well first of all it was

      B
      C
      C+
      B

      If you’re going to insult my ratings at least get them right.

      Second, it was a solid show overall with the big matches being solid all around. It’s not a masterpiece or even a great show but it did what it was supposed to do: started us towards Wrestlemania.

  13. Evan says:

    Well, since Hunter probably isn’t going to Wrestle @ Mania with DAT hair, and Punk has a legitimate case that he should have won that match, it’s going to look like this @ Mania ;

    Rock-Cena-Punk
    Lesnar-Taker W/ HHH as referee

    Seriously, Trips is involved in ALL OF TAKER’S SHENANIGANS these days, and it only makes sense to capitalize on the real life bad blood between the two. Punk gets his WM main event so that the NY crowd doesn’t shit all over Rock-Cena II, Cena gets the title back, and Taker-Lesnar steals the show again. AWESOME.

    • SamualDude says:

      That’s what I see as well Evan. I’m not the biggest fan of back to back Mania rematches. The way Punk has been built up in the last year it’s hard to see him not involved in the WWE championship.

  14. M.R. says:

    Also, in reference to the elbow, Hogan jobbed to the elbow.

  15. Your Eternal Reward says:

    Disappointing in a way that we had to sit through six months of shit to get to the predictable out come. I feel it would of been much better if the title match was announced i don’t know 4-6 weeks ago so that the shit between August – December (well more after Night Of Champions – December) wouldn’t of been so dull.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Yeah I’m not a fan of these matches being announced that far in advance. I didn’t like it with Cena and I don’t like it now.

  16. M.R. says:

    Cole and JBL were both great tonight, they should consider adding JBL as third wheel on Raw fulltime. Loved the oldschool backstage promos, loved the Jericho surprise, and seeing the Godfather will always make me smile. It’s also CRAZY seeing Rock as champ, imagine that thought two years ago.

    Oh, and Big E Langston is going to be a star.

  17. chris says:

    It was a good show results were predictable.

    klunderbunker
    So why did so many people buy it when Rock was in the main event and not CM Punk? Rock is a huge draw, Punk isn’t. It’s really that simple.

    This is incorrect, it’s Wrestlemania it will draw regardless. I still don’t understand why you don’t like punk. He is very much is a draw. People want something new and he’s it. They don’t want to see Cena, Rock, 2 you admitted it yourself. Why not try something new? No risks are taken anymore

    • Thomas Hall says:

      You’re really not that good at this.

      1. Wrestlemania does indeed draw. Rock in the main event drew more money than any Mania ever. Rock wins.

      2. No risks are taken? So you wouldn’t call putting a guy with one match in ten years in the main event of Wrestlemania a risk? What exactly do you classify as a risk?

      3. What makes you think Punk is a draw? This should be interesting.

      • chris says:

        lol you don’t need to be insulting.

        1. Wrestlemania has always and will always draw. Am i saying put 3mb in the main event no. However the notion that one match or indeed one person is responsible for a show success is laughable. If you say that the rock is the sole reason for that show’s success then he could have wrestled anybody.

        2. No I wouldn’t considering it’s not some random guy off the street but The rock who had a wrestling career. A risk would be trying some new stars so you have a business 10 years from now. Grow a new crop

        3. People pay to see him wrestle, thus he’s a draw. I’m just not foolish enough to think that he or anybody else is solely responsible for the success or failure for that matter of wrestlemania or any show.

        I enjoy your writing, I just don’t agree with it all the time.

        have a nice day:)

  18. SamualDude says:

    While I agree that the Rock = Money he didn’t need to win the championship. He’s going to be on the mania card in a big match either way and will draw.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Or they could take him and make the title seem more important again, which is one of its biggest criticisms no?

      • SamualDude says:

        Of course the title is important. I’ve always believed the title is important. I just think that Punk(C) vs Cena vs Rock would be a much better mania match.

  19. Yerp says:

    Would have much rather seen the elbow countered with a GTS attempt.. Of course leading to another counter into the Rock bottom for the pin, eh? 434 days and punk loses to an elbow… Riiiiiight

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I wasn’t wild on the Elbow ending it either. That was kind of lame.

      • Yerp says:

        Can’t lie, for a brief second I hoped Lesnar would interfere after the restart. Next best way to keep the title on Punk without him
        Going over Rock clean, which definitely wasn’t happening

  20. Annonymous says:

    Way to high of a rating. Rock match and Rumble were bad. I don’t see at all how this could be an A level show.

  21. Mike says:

    Sorry KB 2 B’s and C+ doesn’t = A- to me. It was good sure but I think when you do a redo this will will be WAY down like other events you reviewed again. Deserves about a B.

  22. SamualDude says:

    The Rock doesn’t need to win the WWE Championship. He’s only a part-timer. I would of had the shield take out Vince at the end of that segment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.