Wrestlemania Count-Up – Wrestlemania III: The Biggest Match Ever On The Biggest Show Ever

You may also like...

34 Responses

  1. Javier Torres says:

    I agree with bunker. Whether people want to admit it or not Andre-Hogan was the match that put Mania on the map for good. Yes Austin-Rock was a great match at Mania 17 and yes Andre-Hogan wasn’t a great match but the latter match didn’t have to be great to deliver. Believe me if Hogan didn’t face Andre that stadium wouldn’t have been filled. I’m willing to bet that 20 years from now Andre-Hogan would still be remembered more than Austin-Rock. From Mania 17 would and that’s not a knock on either guys as I respect Austin and Rock plus I’m not a Hogan fan but fair is fair. Hogan did more for wrestling than Austin has and again that’s hard for me to admit. 22 years after his death Andre is still remembered fondly by many people even by fans who never even seen him wrestle.

  2. Chrisman says:

    Hogan has been ‘generic old wrestling guy’ since the mid-90s. WCW and the NWO, in the long run, meant absolutely nothing on the grand scale. It was still just rasslin. Rock v Austin took it to another level. As big as Hogan v Andre was, it was just a wrestling match. it didn’t resonate and reverberate on a wider scale. Yeah ok perhaps the initial buzz MAY have been bigger, but in the long run it’s impact fizzled-out. Hogan became the Wrestling Superstar. Rock was and still is the Global Megastar.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: you have no idea what you’re talking about. And no, I won’t be elaborating on that because it would be like talking to a wall.

    • The Killjoy says:

      Hahahahaha! The review just said it was the largest crowd for WWF and their rematch would shatter ratings never to be reached again. Are you stupid?

      HAHAHAHA!

  3. KB, this is probably the best review of Wrestlemania III that I’ve ever read. I grew up in the 1980s and still watch wrestling to this day and there has never been an event like Wrestlemania III in all of the 33 years I’ve been living. It’s one of the few shows where I felt everything delivered.

    Hogan vs Andre from WMIII is one of my favorite matches of all time and to me ranks up there with any match. The match was never meant to be about who is the best technical wrestler or to even be a match that was supposed to be a 30-minute epic you would find between Undertaker and HBK. It was supposed to tell a story with Hogan getting the torch passed to him by Andre and it delivered that with flying colors. As much as Steamboat-Savage was the best match on the card (and my favorite match of all-time), the image people remember most from Wrestlemania III is Hogan slamming Andre, which was an absolutely awesome moment.

    This is still my favorite PPV to this day.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Thanks for reading!

      Absolutely true on the Hogan vs. Andre match. Meltzer gave it -4 stars and said it was one of the worst matches ever. For someone who is supposed to be the undisputed king of wrestling knowledge, he misses a lot of common sense stuff as a fan.

      • chris says:

        As far as a match goes it was garbage. The moment however is something that will live forever. Meltzer is judging it as a match, when you use that criteria it sucks.

  4. Chrisman says:

    I think perhaps people underestimate how much non wrestling fans know and recognize Rock and Austin, and overestimate how much they know and recognize Hulk Hogan. I think it can be argued that Rock and Austin combined had more positive influence over WWE history than Hulk and Andre. And the WM17 match was the one that made it all happen, just like the WM3 match did it for the other two.

    I couldn’t care less about TV ratings. 2 totally different eras, different measuring sticks need to be used. Hogans buzz from that match was done in 5 years. WWE is still living off the WM17 buzz now. And I’m not buying the ‘WM3 started modern wrestling’ line. It didn’t. WM17 did. This is modern, worldwide, wall-to-wall wrestling, and it started with Rock v Austin, not Hulk v Andre.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      In today’s era, as in nearly ten years since Hogan retired as a full time competitor, Hogan has had:

      A series of national commercials with Troy Aikman for Rent-A-Center
      Two reality shows focused on him (Hogan Knows Best and Hulk Hogan’s Celebrity Championship Wrestling)
      Two hours a week on national television with him as a focal point of the show

      In his day he was on the cover of Sports Illustrated and hosted Saturday Night Live (and actually acted with my uncle who was a member of the cast) and had his own Saturday morning cartoon show. Not to mention he spearheaded a company that regularly got great ratings in primetime on a national network in NBC, drawing the highest rating in the history of American television and 33 million viewers, or over 1/10 of the entire country.

      Rock is indeed a mainstream actor but only has been for a few years now. Austin is a b-movie star and that’s about it.

      It’s Hogan and it’s not even close.

      • M.R. says:

        Of course more people recognize Hogan than Rock, he’s been around much longer. But what do they know him for? Dwayne Johnson is a bonofide movie star while Hogan is that old wrestler guy. I’d absolutely say Rock is a bigger star right now.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          Yeah maybe now, but the fact that it’s close when Hogan hasn’t been active for that long is astounding. At their peaks though, it’s not even remotely close.

        • M.R. says:

          I’m not sure it’s all that astounding. Hogan was a big star, people remember big stars. By no means does that mean he’s still a big star today.

          • Thomas Hall says:

            He’s the main character on the main show of the second biggest wrestling company in the world and he was responsible for the highest rating the company ever saw. I’d think that’s still a decent level of star power.

        • M.R. says:

          We just disagree here. I don’t think anybody in TNA is a ‘star’ in the mainstream sense. I’m not sure if anybody from the wrestling world is a ‘star’ other than Cena.

    • chris says:

      I agree Austin and rock started what is now modern wrestling, Still the match that all wrestlemania main events since have been judged. Those two are and will be the biggest stars wrestling has ever produced. Wrestlemania 17 had the greatest main event to the greatest show period. People get into wrestling wanting to be recreate austin and rock not hogan and andre.

  5. M.R. says:

    Thanks Rocko, your opinion means less than nothing.

  6. Si says:

    for meaning Hogan vs Andre was much bigger, Rock vs Austin had a great story and was probably my fav match of all time, but with what Hogan vs Andre did for the sport you can’t argue that this match put WrestleMania on the map as the premier event

    besides when are you ever going to get a 4 year title reign go up against a 15 year unbeaten streak (at any event?)

    • chris says:

      You think andre didn’t lose a match for 15 years? You also think wrestlemania 3 was the first time andre got slammed?

  7. M.R. says:

    I understand why you consider Hogan/Andre the biggest match ever, but is it set in stone? I’d be willing to argue Austin/Rock from WM17 against it.

  8. Yerp says:

    Yeah, I was asking why you see it that way?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Picture this.

      It’s Wrestlemania 28.

      Chimmel: “Ladies and gentlemen this is your opening contest here at Wrestlemania 28!

      Introducing first from West Newberry, Massachusetts……”

      See how the rest of the show could be just a bit of a letdown after that?

      • MikeCheyne says:

        I agree with you that Bret/Owen is a great match but not necessarily the greatest opener. My criteria for a great opening match is that it is relatively short, it features an athletic team/competitor capable of getting the crowd roused, at most it has a simple “bad guys vs. good guys” plot (because more complicated plots deserve more seasoning throughout the show), and generally the face(s) win.

        I really like the Rockers vs. Haku/Barbarian as an opener from VII for that reason.

        Also, among the bastion of bad celebrity guests at WrestleMania, Bob Uecker is definitely one of the best ones (and even Mary Hart is not intolerable). He gets in some good lines during the midget match and has decent chemistry with Monsoon and Jesse.

  9. Yerp says:

    So, if I may ask.. What puts the tag match opener ahead of something like Bret/Owen? Sure the tag match is good for the purpose and the crowd was naturally going to be white hot all night.. But Owen and Bret, to me, is the superior match in quality, suspense, and crowd control. Just wondering, maybe we just view matches differently.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      It’scertainly better in quality. It’s not a better opener though.

      • Stormy says:

        Would the Money In The Bank matches surpass it? Those usually really get the crowd going with the highspots and such. For like 3 years they used that to open Mania,and I thought it was brilliant, as the fans got excited right away.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          Yeah but the problem was there was nowhere to go but down after that. That’s what I’m trying to get at.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.