Fact Correcting WWE

You may also like...

9 Responses

  1. Dragon says:

    Technically WWE is correct in a way……Eric Bischoff gave it to Triple H. Eric ran WCW. In his mind he was handing him the WCW title that Jericho had previously unified with the WWF title. I can see their viewpoint.

  2. BudDakota "The average wrestling fan" says:

    Although I see now that it starts in 2002. I know at one point they were claiming the lineage much further back than that. I used to scope those title histories and tried to memorize them. Also they released a history of the World Heavyweight championship dvd that did in fact, include much of the big gold belt’s nwa/wcw legacy.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      It’s incorrect. That’s really all there is to it.

      I can go shoot a moose, mount it on my wall and say I’m the moose’s second uncle twice removed by marriage but it doesn’t make it the case.

  3. BudDakota "The average wrestling fan" says:

    They’ve listed the title history on wwe.com for years with the lineage dating back to the wcw days. If the wwe says it is, isn’t it? I mean they own the title, the tapes and the lineage. I understand what you are saying and technically you are right, but in the end the big E has the final say.

  4. M.R. says:

    You’ve gotta admit, highlighting old NWA/WCW clips is alot better than the clip of Ric Flair literally handing the belt to Triple H.

  5. A King says:

    I won’t believe it until they mention Chris Benoit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.