On This Day: July 23, 1989 – Great American Bash 1989: WCW’s Magnum Opus

You may also like...

8 Responses

  1. Liam Fenech says:

    You ment Jim Ross on comms Tony had just or was about to join WWF at the time.

  2. Sebastian Howard says:

    I think this show is overrated, whenever I watch it I only ever end up watching the main event because the rest of the card just doesn’t look that interesting HOWEVER I’m really sick of people using WM 17 as the barometer for wrestling shows. You want to talk about overrated, its that show. Taker/Trips was great and Benoit/Angle was one of the best pure wrestling matches of all time but Rock/Austin is simply THE most overrated main event of all time and the Austin turn was a terrible idea (they should’ve turned Flex), Blondes/Dudleys/Hardys is something we’ve already seen a million times and Vince/Shane is just a wasted opportunity…. Shane had JUST BOUGHT WCW AND THEY DIDN’T DO ANYTHING WITH THE WCW GUYS AT WRESTLEMANIA!!! Idiots….

    I should probably post this at the WM 17 review but I don’t want to get attacked by WM 17 fanboys and I thought it was relevant as you were comparing the two shows. I do want to say though, I pretty much agree with you on this show and I think a lot of people who really like it saw it back when it aired in the late 80s and it was cutting edge at the time but now it doesn’t hold up as well. A lot of people say that about this show but very few people actually criticize WM 17 even though I think its just as dated in its own way.

    • Greg says:

      The TLC match was the first (or second?) time they used that match. Sure the Dudleys, Hardys and E&C had faced off a ton but that match was awesome.

      Austin’s turn was shocking at the time. It was a bad decision but shocking in that moment. I assume flex is The Rock. Can’t turn him cause he left for a few months after it.

      The way McMahon’s match went was great. I thought it was bad timing as they probably wanted to do all of the planned stuff first before moving onto WCW (plus they probably didn’t have everything worked out by then).

      Yes, I am a WM 17 fanboy.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      TLC 2 is a classic. I don’t know how else to put that.

      Austin vs. Rock might be the best Wrestlemania main event ever, for the drama and atmosphere alone.

      It’s rated that highly for a reason.

  3. Derek Hamel says:

    I guess the author of this review and I just have different preferences when it comes to wrestling. Giving this show a B plus is absurd. No, it’s not perfect, but it certainly matches up well to any Wrestlemania. Jim Ross was terrific as always and seeing Ric Flair in the midst of the greatest year of his career is a thrill, especially against the Funker, in one of the all time best heel runs in wrestling history.
    A couple of rebuttals. When JR mentioned the quality of wrestling, the writer thought that was absurd because of who was competing in the match. Since when were Shane Douglas and Dan Spivey NOT top notch wrestlers? Douglas was one of the best heels of the 1990’s and Spivey’s work in Japan was exemplary.
    It’s clear that this reviewer is watching this show in hindsight only. I watched it when it originally aired, and therefore I can tell you exactly why the fans at this event were so crazy over Sid Vicious. Sid had just debuted for a national company weeks earlier, and frankly, nobody had ever seen a physical specimen like him. With his height, insane physique, tough guy look, and undeniable charisma, Sid had it all but ring talent and mic ability. But back then those two detriments were covered by using him in the tag team situation in short bursts, letting Spivey do most of the ring work while letting Sid come in for brief high spots. Besides that, Jim Ross provided the textbook example of how to get a guy over through commentary. Ross was highly respected even in those days and when he said Sid was the biggest, baddest man he’d ever seen, folks believed it.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      My rebuttals to your rebuttals:

      1. I’ve never seen a good Spivey match (though I loved him as Waylon Mercy) and Shane is a great heel…..on the mic. In ring, far from it. He’s average at best to me and I still don’t get all of the hype about him. He’s had some excellent matches when he’s surrounded by others, but I certainly wouldn’t call him top notch in the ring.

      2. Indeed it is hindsight as I was a year old when it first aired.

      As for Sid, I would agree that he was very over (and even say so), but again I wouldn’t call him a great worker. A great entertainer and talker (at some points) yes but certainly not a great worker.

      • Derek Hamel says:

        Fair enough. I should mention that I’m very opinionated and occasionally forget to temper my criticism with an occasional kudo. So let me say that of all the dozens of reviews I read of Wrestlemania 30, yours was by far the most concise and, ahem…uh, correct. I couldn’t have said it better.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          Much appreciated. And I have zero problem with someone having a differing opinion. I get annoyed when I’m told I have no idea what I’m talking about because I don’t agree with everything someone else says.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.