Impact Wrestling – August 8, 2013: Agoobwa

You may also like...

12 Responses

  1. M.R. says:

    Though it won’t happen, I’d love for WWE to drop to six as well, especially with the weekly three-hour format. It would essentially eliminate B-show pay per views.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Yeah but WWE can support that many. TNA simply doesn’t have the time to develop enough feuds every month. WWE has about three times the TV that TNA has and can develop that many feuds.

      • Killjoy says:

        Yeah. Funny enough they barely do though.

      • M.R. says:

        Oh I know the WWE’s capable of it, but think of how great the feuds could be if we were given two months build for every big show. They need to do something to spice up PPVs if they’re going to continue give away big name matches on Raw. What’s the point of ordering a show like Payback?

  2. M.R. says:

    Four PPVs isn’t enough. Six seems ideal.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I think you’re right. At least one between Slammiversary and BFG.

      • Killjoy says:

        I’ve been saying that for a while and it seems TNA realized it by throwing these “TV Specials”. We should probably expect No Surrender to be announced after this one.

  3. noahconstrictor says:

    As soon as I saw the Agoobwa, I knew this was gonna be bad. Didn’t realize it was gonna be this bad.

  4. Christian Sharp says:

    Sigh…and it sounded like they had it together for a while…

    That tagline has me thinking. Was there a show you would give an overall rating of Agoobwa to? Like New Blood Rising?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I’ve seen some indy shows that I would say was that bad overall. For a major show……I’m sure some 1999 WCW was that bad. Oh and most ECW PPVs.

      • Christian Sharp says:

        Yeah, reading how WCW was at that time just boggles me. Have to agree that it was the last year they had a chance, but they really screwed it up.

        By the way, I noticed you haven’t done Starrcade 1999 yet. With some of the stupid stuff that happened there, including a rehash of Montreal, it sounds like it would be interesting to see you review.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          Nah they were LONG dead in 2000. By that point they had nothing to lose so they just threw whatever they felt like out there.

          I’ll try to put it up this weekend.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.