Ode To The Big Gold Belt

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. james gracie says:

    Wasn’t that the problem of having the World Title….too many people who shouldn’t or wouldn’t have been champion were…it really watered down a lot of things. Especially when guys like Khali, Swagger, Christian and Ziggler were in the same ring as Bret, Foley, and HBK

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I don’t mind those guys being world champion. Well maybe Swagger but that’s about it.

      One other thing that it helps: it cuts down on the insane amount of titles people can win. That got so out of hand it was unreal.

    • M.R. says:

      I see no problem with Christian and Khali being world champion, I was always a fan of Khali as the monster heel. Swagger and Ziggler on the other hand, yikes.

  2. chad says:

    i tend to disagree with that statement about the world title not being able to be traced to the nwa title. One, its the same belt design, two, if a title is unified with another title then the lineage carries on, now the nwa belt was “transformed” into the wcw international title and that does muddle the history a bit but it still stands: the nwa title was absorbed into the wcw title which was merged with the wwf title to become the undisputed title which split into the world title so there isn’t really a break in the link there its just muddy history

    • Thomas Hall says:

      The belt design doesn’t hold up. If the belt design is all you need, then the NWA Virginia Title has the same lineage of the Intercontinental Title. Same design.

      The WCW International Title is the same thing: just the same design. It had no connection to the NWA Title other than its look and the person who was holding it. Yes it’s the same physical belt, but it’s two different titles.

      The history just isn’t there, and yes I blow this out of proportion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.