King of the Ring 2000: Not Even 2000 Was Perfect

You may also like...

14 Responses

  1. Deepthroat Ghoul says:

    Save for the iffy ending at WrestleMania 16, every WWF PPV from the first half of 2000 (that even includes Insurrextion) had been superb, with good in-ring action, logical booking, and great main events. But then, we get to this show, and everything that worked from Royal Rumble to Judgment Day didn’t work here. The workrate was average, the booking was stupid, and the main event was a catastrophe.

    Why is it that every year, King of the Ring kills any momentum the WWF has after WrestleMania? At least since the advent of monthly PPV’s in 1995, the only year where a KOTR show actually advanced storylines was Steve Austin’s win in 1996. The main event between Shawn Michaels and Davey Boy Smith was awesome, and Austin winning the 1996 KOTR tournament started a legacy. Other than that, King of the Ring hadn’t really been good since Owen Hart’s win in 1994.

    Luckily, Fully Loaded would undo all the damage done by this poorly-booked show.

  2. Thomas Hall says:

    Aware of and understand all that. Just don’t like Rikishi.

  3. meka 3000 says:

    “Still no excuse for me having to sit through their stupid dancing every single week.”

    They didn’t force you to watch every single week. You did that. Besides those 3 were still more worthy than the likes of Val Venis and Perry Saturn.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I’ll give you Venis. Not so much on Saturn.

      • meka 3000 says:

        In a vacuum I’d agree with you on Perry Saturn. But given context Perry Saturn wasn’t drawing any heat in his singles matches in 2000.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          I’d still take him over the dancing fat man any day.

        • ted says:

          Basically comes down to whom you enjoy more. In my opinion Saturn is way more entertaining to watch. Rikish is not, no matter the significance of his career vs Saturns.

        • meka 3000 says:

          “I’d still take him over the dancing fat man any day.”

          Perhaps but that’s not the way the wwe office thinks while fans sit in silence while watching him. Sure it was a result of Saturn not being utilized well, but you don’t push an unover person JUST BECAUSE he might hypothetically get over, while not pushing guys who WERE OVER.

          Personally I liked Rikishi and Too Cool for what they were. They were especially fun to watch in 6 man tag matches.

  4. ted says:

    Thank you for fulfilling my request.

  5. Little Jerry Lawler says:

    Long run, I meant to say.

  6. Little Jerry Lawler says:

    So what is your problem with Too Cool and Rikishi again?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      They were midcard champions when the Radicalz were around?

      • Little Jerry Lawler says:

        So were the Radicalz. Too Cool and Rikishi were over with their gimmick and got a push and midcard titles because of it. Besides, it’s not like they had a long with them. Trying to turn Rikishi into a main event heel was a mistake but I had no major problems with them before that. It’s a part of what’s missing in WWE today. Barrett may be a good case as people though the Bad News gimmick was terrible. Then he got over with it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.