Royal Rumble Count-Up – 2007: Wrestlemania Comes Early

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. M.R. says:

    It’s funny how content we were back in 2007. If the final two of one of today’s Rumbles had been guys that’ve been around for 15 years the bitching would be endless.

    • Jerichoholic94 says:

      As much as I agree, I don’t think we can say that for sure… Big Show and Kane ain’t no Taker or HBK at all

  2. Gunther_224 says:

    Eh I dare say Taker winning was the right call. For one thing HBK already won twice plus it’s tradition for a wrestler to job in his/her hometown.

  3. Derek Hamel says:

    The review is pretty much spot-on with the exception of the author’s rant defending the abilities of John Cena, with a very simplistic and patently untrue explanation regarding fans’ reasons for their dislike.
    The vast, vast majority of wrestling fans who didn’t, and don’t, like Cena dislike him not because ‘kids like him’, but because of a few actual reasons:
    A) He’s just not that good. Cena has wrestled some quality matches in his career, and I actually thought the writer undervalued this particular match vs Umaga at just a B+. (I might go as high as an A minus). But considering the amount of high profile matches against quality opponents he’s had over the last decade plus, that number is skimpy indeed. His skill set and movement are very limited, his psychology is only average, and his go-to maneuvers (weak fist drop, standing fireman’s carry) are soft and showy.
    B) Fans nowadays are aware that top stars have always been the ones whom promoters push the most. But the incessant mega-push given to Cena rubs those who prefer options the wrong way. Is that his fault? Sure it is, in the wrestling world…simply by existing.
    C) His personality grates. Childish poop jokes are not a substitute for strong mic work.
    Therefore, it’s not because kids love Cena that older male fans don’t appreciate him. Rather, kids love him because his persona and push are engineered strictly for them.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      You can call me KB instead of the writer. It sounds so formal.

      A. I would certainly disagree with Cena not being good. He’s proven time and time again that he can have great matches with almost anyone. I’m not saying he’s Shawn Michaels or Lou Thesz, but he’s around the level of a HHH: he can make bad opponents look good and can combine to make something special.

      As for the soft and showy moves, I don’t see why that’s a bad thing. Also, I’d hardly call AAing some of the people he’s thrown on his shoulders soft. Deadlifting Big Show like that is anything but soft.

      B. The promoters push those people because they draw the most money. If you look back over time, Cena’s main events and major matches have drawn better than anyone else in his era. He’s there because people care about him, even if they don’t like him. It’s far, far better to come out to a reaction of some sort than to come out to crickets.

      C. I can go with this one. Those make my eyes roll as well.

      As for the conclusion, it’s a smart idea to appeal to children. Think of it like this:

      If an adult goes to a show, that’s one ticket sold and maybe a t-shirt. If a child goes to a show, it’s a ticket for the child and the parent, plus maybe two hot dogs, sodas and a t-shirt. Also, if you make a child a fan, he might be a fan for life. That’s years and years of tickets and viewership. Appealing to children makes sense, as long as you have other acts to balance that out.

      • M.R. says:

        Love the Cena/Triple H comparison. Spot on.

      • Derek Hamel says:

        KB, nothing you said is incorrect. In a business sense, of course it’s smart and practical to have a product that endears to kids. I don’t question WWE’s decade plus push of Cena. They’d be fools not to. My comments were based on a couple of other things: the multitudes of non-Cena fans, myself included and it’s not only “smart” fans, feel that way because they’re not kids. It’s two different debates, business sense vs personal preference.
        Still, I must disagree with your rundown regarding Cena’s ring skills. I do believe Cena can be carried to a very good match. I do not agree that he can carry a lesser opponent. I’m not an enormous Triple H fan, but I respect the guy and have to say he’s miles past Cena in every facet of the sport.
        Regarding my intense dislike for maneuvers like the 5 knuckle shuffle, that’s probably just because I’m old. I was 30 when Rocky came up with the People’s Elbow, and just hated it. Again, personal preference.
        But the bottom line is always the dollar, and in that regard, Cena has been very good for pro wrestling indeed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.