- Next story Monday Night Raw – January 18, 2016: Not That It Matters (Maybe)
- Previous story 2015 Awards: Moment of the Year
Sponsored Links
Random Review
Recent Comments
- Thomas Hall on Saturday Night’s Main Event #18 (2024 Edition): When Super Isn’t Enough
- Liam Fenech on Ask KB
- Liam Fenech on Ask KB
- Liam Fenech on Saturday Night’s Main Event #18 (2024 Edition): When Super Isn’t Enough
- Thomas Hall on Ask KB
Sponsored Links
Categories
- AEW (636)
- Columns (426)
- ECW (102)
- General (1,694)
- Daily News Update (820)
- Hidden Gems (51)
- Match Compilations (2)
- Guest Posts (16)
- Impact (770)
- Miscellaneous (683)
- NXT (1,193)
- PPV Previews (410)
- Raw (1,701)
- ROH (522)
- Site Stuff (473)
- Smackdown (1,147)
- TNA (162)
- TNA PPV (213)
- Uncategorized (4)
- WCW (545)
- WCW PPV (162)
- WWE (1,573)
- WWE PPV (1,501)
- WWF PPV (1,113)
Sponsored Links
It’s not that bad, plenty have won it from the starting two. Benoit was in a similar situation, Heyman screwed him over and stacked the odds against him.
So does this mean Lesnar enters #30 or #2?
I would assume you either have Reigns/Lesnar go from the start to the end together or they meet up for the big finale by entering at opposite ends of the Rumble.
I would think closer to the end so Reigns can say Brock didn’t beat him fresh.
My thought process is that you should start Lesnar at #2 because you’re paying him a huge amount of be there so why not make him work for it?
Eh true to a degree but Brock more than earns his money becaus no one else can do what he does.
They’re really going to make Reigns do the 92 Rumble routine, aren’t they? Hell, this is more demanding than that, given Flair drew #3.
I have a bad feeling about this. This opens the door to SO MANY bad booking possibilities, and God knows how bad the Rumble booking has gotten lately.