NXT Takeover: Dallas: Night of a Thousand Chants

You may also like...

16 Responses

  1. Heyo says:

    “FIGHT FOREVER” and “BOTH THESE GUYS” are some of the best chants of all time if you ask me.

  2. Dark Grin says:

    Pretty meaningless at this point, but the chainsaw & leather smock were Balor’s nod to Leatherface/Texas Chainsaw Massacre.

  3. Bloodbuzz Bunk says:

    I think the negativity on Nakamura there is way overblown. The amount of moves one does or doesn’t do rarely amounts to their worth as a wrestler or the quality of a given match. Nakamura transcends the average or even above average puro/strong style striker. He transcends not because he only has “2” moves( which he doesn’t I have only seen 6 of his matches prior to this) but because the man is charismatic and flamboyant and flashes. He grabs your attention and then he contrast it with viciousness which is such an interesting dynamic. He understands how to pace a match and when he needs to turn up his swaggering antics or lean on his chain wrestling and ring awareness and yes his knees. The knee strikes are essentially a secondary gimmick. If he faced Luke Harper I would imagine he would moonwalk then kick him in the head because nobody no sells a swift kick in the head.

    • Eric says:

      I was making the point not because this is the first match of his that I’ve seen. I was making the point because I assumed that after seeing him many times, things would be adapted in some regard in the states as that style I fear will not go over well with the broader American audience. And I’m not a “moves guy”, but I did feel this match was limited for a lot of reasons. You had a sequence where they just hit forearms for a few minutes, you had every counter of Nakamura’s become a knee strike or kick, and it just seemed to me that if this wasn’t NXT, you’d be getting “boring” chants. I fear that will be his future if there isn’t a variance in his match styles.

    • Jeff says:

      “nobody no sells a swift kick in the head”

      Well except Brock Lesnar.

      Nakamura will need to incorporate a little more variety in his moves. Using just strikes will become very tedious. It is also hard to setup near falls with just strikes. I don’t usually care about movesets but pure strong style is not really suited for the US.

      To be fair, I haven’t seen anything of his besides this match (which I loved) so maybe he does have more variety that I haven’t seen.

      • Bloodbuzz Bunk says:

        I agree he will have to adapt some but he also has a ton of his own spots already so again I don’t think it’s a huge gap. You look at guys like Hogan, Austin, Rock, and Cena, arguably the baby face Mount Rushmore, and they all primarily were strikers in their prime/peak popularity. Hogan and Cena were/are the big right hand/clothesline type and Austin and Rock pioneered attitude era brawling. I think personality > trumps most things in wrestling.

        I think the idea of adapting to WWE style with signature moves and repeatable spots is important for guys like Kenta who is awesome in ring but doesn’t have the personality to carry that style and can come off as repetitive.

        • Eric says:

          For any guy it’s important. Charisma and personality are most important, but of the 4 million people that watched Raw on Monday, how many would enjoy a 15 minute match that is 90 percent “strikes”? I’m not saying Nakamura needs to be Kurt Angle, but he does need to do something in ring that stands out. Nothing did in this match and I was looking for him to show American fans that while he’ll never fully lose who he was, he is going to work to become more. I hope this match is a one off to the internet fans that have seen his style before and that he works to change things up moving forward.

          You also have to keep in mind that Hogan, Cena, Austin, and Rock, while charismatic are 4 of the greatest ever on a mic. Nakamura won’t have that luxury. If he can’t do it on a mic, he’s gotta do more in a ring. It’s that simple.

  4. Stormy says:

    I loved this show, and the blood stoppages added to the match in my opinion, as they gave Joe a reason to get more monster-like, and they also gave the match a chance to pace itself.

    Just a quick thing about the Demon entrance. Much like London had a theme (Jack the Ripper), Dallas had a theme. He was in Texas. With a Chainsaw. Getting ready for a Massacre….

  5. Jay H (the real one) says:

    I still say this Takeover is up there with Brooklyn from last year.

  6. J says:

    I was shocked at your live comments after the show and am much happier after you saw the tv version. This show was awesome. I’m not saying that as an Internet fan or Indy fan or anything. It was so freaking enjoyable. I think it was just amazing and is in my top three for the ten NXT specials.

    I also thought Joe picked his game up ten levels when they were wiping his blood off. Imo, it came across very well on tv and actually added to the event because you saw two guys wanting to take it further when the delays happened.

    I will say this is a classic show worth re watching down the road. Awesome stories being told and real feels throughout the evening.

  7. Eric says:

    I’m thoroughly disappointed in your review here. I feel you being at the show and the crowd itself has clouded your judgment. The Zayn/Nakamura match was everything you normally hate and would call “not wrestling”. Literally Nakamura hit 2 wrestling moves outside of “strikes” all match and botched one. Zayn kept trying to remind him it is wrestling but he kept countering with “strikes” that after 5 minutes when he was winded looked weak. On top of that we got ONE near fall. All the elements that usually make up A matches for you weren’t present. If anything, you could say this was a “fight”, but then you have to compare it to things like Lesnar/Cena, where there was real animosity so this wouldn’t hold up for more than 5 seconds. The crowd ate this up, but this wasn’t very good. I can only imagine how the regular crowd at Raw would view 15 minutes of strikes…

    • Thomas Hall says:

      See the thing is I can buy that with someone like Nakamura who they push as that kind of guy. I get annoyed at this kind of stuff when they do the same style over and over all night long with little variety. Yeah the live experience probably had something to do with it but that’s not something that can really be controlled.

      • Eric says:

        I just wonder if that style is sustainable in WWE. Like I said, if he doesn’t vary from that style, it may not work with every wrestler he works with, nor with all the fans.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          Yeah that’s going to be an issue. Him on the main roster could be…..something.

        • Eric says:

          After seeing that match, I wouldn’t rush it. I don’t know how his English is, but he has to have some variance in what he does and probably needs to speak or something at some point. I just imagine him facing someone larger that can “take him out of his style” and I wonder how that will work? Can he do that? Because he can’t realistically get in a ring with say, Luke Harper, and strike him to death.

  8. Bloodbuzz Bunk says:

    I liked the Women’s title more but I guess that’s just a difference in how the Asuka Lock is interpreted. I have always viewed it as sleeper/Koquina clutch type maneuver that traps the arm so the head can be easily targeted. It’s not my favorite finisher to say the least because it’s just a visually dynamic maneuver.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.