Which Royal Rumble Should I Redo?

Kasi Kid says:

Dude it’s the 20th Anniversary of the ’97 edition, do that one it’s a no-brainer and review the next RAW after it I believe it was a good one with Bret quitting beggining of the show and coming back after Vince & commissioner Gorilla Moonson tried to compensate him for being screwed outta the Rumble match, s*** Stone Cold doing Stone Cold things and running rampart and the main event was Stone Cold Steve Austin vs. The Undertaker (and Taker was only a replacement that night for an injured Syco Sid) so yeah KB LET’S RUMBLE LIKE IT’S ’97

Prophet says:

2007.

The whole show is rather excellent and even the ECW title match doesn’t last long.

Maynard37 says:

1998 is a childhood favourite, would like to see that revisited

Awesome_Miz says:

The only one appropriate for this show has to be 1997

Heyo says:

I said it last year and I’ll say it again. 2014 is my pick, because a lot of WWE’s modern problems arguably started with that one show.

Jerichoholic94 says:

I always thought 2001 was solid.

J says:

I know they are recent, but either 2014 or 2015. 2014 was the turn on Batista. 2015 was the turn on Reigns. Pittsburgh and Philly both did a tremendous job. I would love a perspective a few years later to see what the feeling is.