Smackdown – January 17, 2017: It’s No Big Deal Anymore

You may also like...

12 Responses

  1. M.R. says:

    Why are there four announcers?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Probably so they can give JBL more targets.

    • ted says:

      I’m convinced the company is trying to see how many announcers they can cram on their shows. Raw has 3 or 4 smackdown has 4 nxt has 3 205 live has 2 I’m assuming the new u.k. will have 2 at least.

  2. CrazySole says:

    With the announcement of the elimination chamber, I feel like the Rumble winner will definitely be from Raw now

    • Jerichoholic94 says:

      It wouldn’t be the first time they had a chamber after somebody from the same brand won the rumble would it?

    • Prophet says:

      It’s for the belt though, not the title shot.

      Could easily still be a Smackdown guy who wins the RR.

      • Jerichoholic94 says:

        Woops I made a mistake. Same difference though they’ve had the EC with both separate titles on the line after the rumble before.

  3. Prophet says:

    Bliss vs. Bella at Mania for the belt. Nikki to win because she is FEARLESS! Fearless, KB. Don’t you dare forget it!

    You could hold off doing Becky/Mickie until then if you really wanted. They’ll probably wrestle seven times or something like AJ/Jericho did last year.

  4. Jay H (the real one) says:

    Another fine episode of Smackdown and i like they are already setting up the Elimination Chamber next month following the Royal Rumble. The King’s Court segment was fine and did it’s job getting over Dolph as a Heel once again. It’s also good having Mickie James officially back.

  5. Killjoy says:

    Found the Ziggler/Lawler stuff to be pretty pathetic. Death threats one day after paying tribute to Jimmy Snuka. Racking up the tasteless promotional tactics pretty early.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.