Survivor Series 2002 (2017 Redo): What Was That Again?

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. A Note on Kane says:

    While I’m here, what’s the deal regarding your changing attitude towards Kane? Once upon a time you would often mention what a mark you were for him and give him the credit he certainly deserves. In recent times you have been rude about his in-ring talent (not necessarily in this review). You aren’t pandering to young PG-era smarks who complain about his longevity, are you?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      My opinion changes on a lot of people. I’m a Kane fan but he’s not the most interesting guy in the world at times. I like him in a midcard role, not so much as a main event guy.

  2. M.R. says:

    Look at the four other guys in the chamber though, they’ve never been treated to be on Shawn or Triple H’s level, they’re more upper midcarders than main eventers. Not saying they didn’t deserve to be bigger deals (particularly Booker and Jericho), but I would expect nothing less than the WWE making this all about the two ‘real’ stars.

  3. Fox says:

    It’s cool to see you change your opinions on the Elimination Chamber match as you go on. While it’s no masterpiece, it’s definitely a fun match.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.