Smackdown – June 20, 2017: With Some Fresh Anger

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. Marky-Marc says:

    So assuming you read my comment on the ‘Suggestions’ column, this is something I was referring to.
    Here, you didn’t mention Becky’s little speech she gave to Bryan in the back. Maybe you didn’t think it was important enough to mention but it was different from the other girls complaints. It had passion and frustration behind it whereas the other three were reading off cue cards. Anyone reading this without seeing the show would just think it was a waste of thirty seconds when it really wasn’t.
    Then you failed to mention Bryan losing it on Ellsworth for mentioning his daughter. It was prob the best part of the show and you didn’t mention it, this letting a reader believe that nothing special happened here other than his announcement.
    I may be nitpicking but it’s things like this that i notice and see a decline in the quality of your reviews.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I did indeed read it, as I do with almost all of the comments on here. Also, thank you for the comments as I need that kind of stuff.

      As for the other stuff, there are two things here.

      As for Becky, that’s entirely on me. I had seen all of the women say the same thing and I assumed it would be the same with her and I didn’t pay as much attention as I had before as I was typing up a match rating. That’s my fault entirely.

      The Bryan part is more in the area of not including every detail on purpose. The problem with recapping every single thing that everyone says is it makes the reviews WAY longer than they need to be. Now in this case it probably should have been included, but I tend to gloss over a lot of details like that and go for more of a general summary as I don’t like the reviews to go on and on far longer than they need to.

      I get what you mean though and I’ll try to firm those up a bit.

  2. Dragon says:

    I don’t see the problem with the way Carmella won…..her and James Elsworth are HEELS. They are supposed to look for the easiest way to win. (see Honky Tonk Man’s IC title reign) I know everyone thinks it should be some big historic moment for women but c’mon at the end of the day, the job is to tell a story with heroes and villains. A lot of over reaction over this. The result was heelish and it worked. Did you hear the reaction they got at the top of Smackdown? A rematch is stupid.

  3. Aeon Mathix says:

    I think the point of doing the women’s match again was because of the backlash against it so they are just trying again. Maybe

    • Jay H (the real one) says:

      That would be my guess at least as to why they are doing it again. I don’t see the problem with doing it one more time.

  4. Eric says:

    Wait, and they didn’t have Mike and Maria Kanellis on after advertising them?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.