Monday Night Raw – December 11, 2017: Which Way Is Philadelphia?

You may also like...

8 Responses

  1. Thomas Hall says:

    Here’s the thing about news reports like that, and why they can be unfair to people like Meltzer.

    For argument’s sake, let’s say Lesnar was hurt. That show was about a month ago and there’s over six weeks before the Rumble. Maybe he got it diagnosed and it wasn’t as bad as it seemed. Possible, no?

    Meltzer reports that he’s hurt and the Rumble may be in jeopardy. Then it’s not as bad as it seems and Lesnar is good to go.

    Now, does that make what Meltzer said inaccurate? Not at all. It was accurate at the time, but things changed. The reaction though? “MELTZER IS STUPID AND MAKES UP NONSENSE!”

    So, at the time, yeah I believed the story that Lesnar was hurt. Maybe he was and it wasn’t as bad as it seemed or maybe he never was in the first place.

    As for Sheamus, he’s certainly been less active than usual as of late. People work hurt all the time. That doesn’t make what was said untrue.

    Back to the original point of all this though: it’s true that I missed the Lesnar part, but, based on what we saw on Raw (with one guy being the last man standing while the other guy is left laying), that doesn’t scream triple threat. Now that’s where they’ll likely go because WWE loves themselves some triple threats, but it’s not exactly logical booking.

  2. Aeon Mathix says:

    I think the triple threat is where they are going too. Makes sense if you don’t want Strowman beaten by Brock again so cue Kane to take the fall. The match itself doesn’t sound very interesting, but I don’t think any of us believe Brock is dropping that thing at the Rumble so might as well have a match like this instead of against another star who has no chance.

    • IC says:

      I think everyone except the writer of this review sees the triple threat is where they are clearly going.
      I really hope Lesnar does defend at the pay per view (assuming he’s not injured or something) but this doesn’t give me a lot of hope.
      Seriously dude?
      They announced Lesnar is showing up on RAW next week, which you failed to mention in your report.
      Improvement needed.

      • Thomas Hall says:

        Given that he said he was injured at Survivor Series and the rumor that he wasn’t going to have a Rumble match from less than two weeks ago, I don’t think it’s that far out of the question. The triple threat is likely, but it’s not like it’s a layup given various circumstances.

        • IC says:

          Brock was injured at Survivor Series?
          Sounds like some BS from Dave “The Newsboy” Meltzer” to me.
          Dude also said Sheamus was badly injured and near retirement and would not really be bumping in his match against Rollins on RAW.
          That seemed about as valid as him reporting that Balor was in line to fight Lesnar for the title at Royal Rumble despite not being positioned anywhere near that level lately.
          Key word in your sentence there was rumor, which should have applied to the first part as well.

  3. Jay H (the real one) says:

    I imagine we are heading for a Triple Threat at the Royal Rumble with Kane & Braun challenging Brock Lesnar. Also what was Absolution really saying that annoyed you? Roman & Cesaro was still really good as was the Cruiserweight Match once again.

    • Dragon says:

      Go back and listen to their promo…there are a string of catchphrases in there and it does not come off as natural. They even rip off one of Enzo’s lines by referring to themselves as the Absolution Train…..how many trains are needed on Raw?

  4. Dragon says:

    Kane vs Lesnar could be interesting for a one off match. I wasnt aware they never faced eachother one on one. Strowman vs Lesnar has been done already. Also, I agree KB Absolution’s endless string of catchphrases made me roll my eyes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.