Best Of 2018: Worst Wrestler Of The Year

IMG Credit: WWE

This one is something that I had to think about a few times. It takes a lot to go from just not very good to one of the worst around and that’s what we have here. This is a shorter list as there are only so many possibilities to choose from, but the ones that are bad really are fairly terrible, at least more often than not.

Shane McMahon

I’m only putting him in the nominees because Shane isn’t around very often and when he’s there, he puts in a pretty solid effort. Now at the same time, when he is around, it’s in a bunch of spots that he REALLY doesn’t deserve because, at the end of the day, Shane is almost 50 years old and takes up a spot that could help someone else’s career. He’s more of an annoyance than anything else and that really never stops.

Curt Hawkins

Losing every match for a year (plus) has to qualify you for something like this. How does he survive the nearly weekly performance reviews that Stephanie loves to have?

Baron Corbin

Now this is one where your definition of wrestler can vary. Corbin is perfectly watchable in the ring. I mean, he’s certainly not good or anything and he goes completely nuts with the arm trap chinlocks, but he can work a match. On the other hand if you go with the character work, Corbin is about as badly written of a character as you can get and one of the worst ideas all year. We’ll get to that one later, but there are worse people for this list.

Dolph Ziggler

This is a name that shows up on these lists a lot and I can see both sides of it. First of all, Ziggler is talented and I don’t think there’s any real argument to be made otherwise. He’s won several titles and can put on an entertaining match. The problem though is he never changes and if you’ve seen one Ziggler match, you’ve seen them all. He hasn’t evolved in years and it’s become a chore to watch him every week. You might get a good match out of him every now and then, but the stuff in between those matches are a near nightmare.

Now you might be wondering why Nia Jax isn’t on here. The thing about Jax is she can do something that no one else can do. She’s a giant and has size that no one else approaches. I get sick of her, but I can see why she’s around so often, at least from WWE’s perspective. That’s not the case with the winner.

Tamina

WHAT IS THE POINT OF TAMINA??? She’s the oldest woman on the roster, she’s the daughter of someone that WWE has basically erased from history, she gets hurt a lot, she’s downright terrible in the ring, and she’s basically a mini Nia Jax. Is she really just on the roster for the sake of giving Nia a lackey? Every time I see her I don’t understand why she’s there as it’s not like she adds a single thing to any match she’s in. This was easy for me and has been the case for a long time.

Remember to follow me on Twitter @kbreviews and pick up the paperback edition of KB’s Complete 1997 Monday Night Raw Reviews (also available as an e-book) from Amazon. Check out the information here:

https://kbwrestlingreviews.com/2018/11/20/new-paperback-complete-1997-monday-night-raw-reviews/

And check out my Amazon author page with cheap wrestling books at:

http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Hall/e/B00E6282W6

PDFPrint