Best Of 2019: Worst Major Show Of The Year
IMG Credit: WWE
Yeah we had to get to this one too, even though it is the kind of thing that rarely ends well. In this case we have a few choices to pick from and believe it or not, one of them has to do with Saudi Arabia. Other than that it’s likely going to be about one show, but that’s the case with this one more often than not.
Super Showdown
We’ll start off in Saudi Arabia as they’re already recycling a name from another (and much better) show. This one was built around the idea of Goldberg vs. Undertaker in a match that might have been really good twenty years ago, but they did have a solid segment building things up. The aura was there, but that’s about as far as I can go with the positives.
Here’s the thing: I can give Goldberg vs. Undertaker all the slack in the world for one simple reason: Goldberg was hurt and basically out on his feet. Yes it was bad but it was bad because of an injury, and that’s a different story entirely. What isn’t a different story is Randy Orton vs. HHH, Seth Rollins defending against Baron Corbin and Kofi Kingston defending against Dolph Ziggler. Outside of the dream match main event, this show felt thrown together with every rematch they could think of and those matches were awful. Terrible show here, with the least amount of effort possible.
Royal Rumble
Really, this wasn’t a bad show but I needed more than two nominees for the whole thing. As tends to be the case with the bigger shows, this was too long and needed to be trimmed down by a good bit. I know it’s cool to have the Women’s Royal Rumble but at the same time, there is only so much that can be done with such a long show. If you’re going to have two matches go an hour, you really can’t put much else on the show other than maybe three other matches. Since it’s WWE, this one had SEVEN more, only one of which was less than twelve minutes long.
That’s where the whole thing falls apart: it’s way too long and the Rumble winners are hardly memorable. You can probably chalk that up to booking, but having two Rumbles on the same day makes the match, as in the point of the show, feel a lot less important. I’m really not a fan of this and I don’t see it getting any better in 2020. That’s quite the shame, but WWE tends to be able to mess up their best things by making them too long.
Ok you know what’s winning so let’s get it over with.
Hell In A Cell
What is there even to say about this? A majority of the card was made less than three days before the show, with multiple matches being added on Sunday. It felt like this show didn’t matter to the company and the fans who paid to see it were wasting their money in one way or another. If WWE doesn’t care about the match, why in the world should the people paying their money to see it? Now normally that’s as bad of a reaction as you can get, but in this case there’s something a lot worse.
The Cell has been around for over twenty years and is one of WWE’s true aces. Even in the PG Era, the match still has a certain mystique and aura around it. That was thrown away for the sake of….what even was the point anyway? WWE put the title on the Fiend THE SAME MONTH but for some reason they needed to have him lose (because a referee stoppage is a loss) here in one of his first major matches.
It’s not like it was some fluke either. Rollins beat the fire out of him for the whole match and then it was stopped with Rollins winning. Yeah Fiend got up, but the damage was done. This was horrible and capped off one of the worst shows of all time from any company, let alone just in 2019.
Remember to follow me on Twitter @kbreviews and pick up the paperback edition of KB’s Complete 2004 Monday Night Raw Reviews (also -available as an e-book) from Amazon. Check out the information here:
http://kbwrestlingreviews.com/2019/08/26/new-book-and-e-book-kbs-complete-2004-monday-night-raw-reviews/
And check out my Amazon author page with cheap wrestling books at: