New Column: Surviving The Series
People keep saying this show doesn’t work anymore. It isn’t that hard to make it work.
https://wrestlingrumors.net/tommyhall/kbs-review-surviving-series/
- Next story WWE vs. ECW Head To Head (2020 Redo): It Does Feel Big
- Previous story Survivor Series Count-Up – 2002 (2017 Redo): The Chamber Barely Survived
Sponsored Links
Random Review
Recent Comments
- Mike M. on Dynamite – November 20, 2024: This Didn’t Make Me Any More Interested In Full Gear
- Thomas Hall on Ask KB
- Grandmaster B on Ask KB
- Thomas Hall on Smackdown – September 21, 2007: The Wedding Show
- Liam Fenech on Ask KB
Sponsored Links
Categories
- AEW (623)
- Columns (426)
- ECW (102)
- General (1,687)
- Daily News Update (813)
- Hidden Gems (51)
- Match Compilations (2)
- Guest Posts (16)
- Impact (766)
- Miscellaneous (683)
- NXT (1,185)
- PPV Previews (408)
- Raw (1,697)
- ROH (518)
- Site Stuff (472)
- Smackdown (1,142)
- TNA (159)
- TNA PPV (211)
- Uncategorized (4)
- WCW (545)
- WCW PPV (162)
- WWE (1,567)
- WWE PPV (1,499)
- WWF PPV (1,112)
Sponsored Links
Theres no piont watching Survior Series anymore if its brand v brand as there will be no conicqunice once its over. No title can change hands, Wrestlers and staff will forget what happed And the direction of the company won’t change forever. Tell me Why is this a PPV now? It should just be a TV special Now Survior Series 2014 was GREAT! as it had high steaks and conicqunices imagine that If you’re going to do every year WWE just bring back Bragging Rights and stop wasting this once fun PPVs time.
Because why are you going to drop one of your Bigger Shows after 30 plus Years?
It sadess me it really does but over the last few years WWE has shown they really don’t care about this show So why should I? Other then the Undertaker possibly showing up for his 30 year celebration Can you tell me from a wrestling standpoint Why I should watch this years show? None of the wrestlers will think about brand loyalty once the nights over, No titles will be defended No one gains anything from winning or vince veresa and as a fan unless you favour one brand over the other you probably have no reason to care WWE needs to remember the original idea for the show. Back in the early days it was all just elimination tag matches and no title matches until 1991 when Undertaker won his 1st world title but that was ok for 1 reason Everybooy had a reason to fight each other in the tag matches. Now WWE tells everyone there has to be brand warfare despite giving no reason/Incentive why it has to be so.
Well I’m sure you’ll either watch it and bitch or not watch it, read the Review and bitch anyway.
Trust me Jay H I can promise you this I will read the review but I won’t bitch about it as I have no expectations for it anyway. NXT War Games looking good though
I’ll believe it when i see it.
I like the RAW vs Smackdown stuff but i would agree there should be something at stake in both Elimination Tag Matches. Like the winning Team’s Show gets first dibs in the Next Draft or #30 in the Royal Rumble.
Also, this is where not having Raw and Smackdown General Managers actually HURTS. In the 2003 edition, you had Raw Co-G.M.s Eric Bischoff’s and Steve Austin’s Survivor Series Raw Team battling each other with Bischoff and Austin’s G.M. jobs on the line. After Bischoff’s team won, he promised them each a “favor” to be cashed over the course of the next few weeks and months. That worked. Now you have “WWE Official” Adam Pierce to act as a de-facto G.M. to both brands, which just…..doesn’t.
What would u think if they put all da champions from each brand 2gether n a brand vs brand match and then just have other survivor series elimination matches btwn other wrestlers from their respective shows KB?
Nah. No need to put everything like that into one big match. Makes the rest of the show seem worthless.