Edge. Timed well, people didn’t see it coming, effective, set the tone for the idea going forward. Since then it has been WAY too much about the “OH WOW THEY ONLY WON IT LIKE AN HOUR AGO” or “HEY! DID YOU KNOW I STILL HAVE THIS” and then a three month wait before anything happens.
I don’t think WWE wants womens MIITB. They can bearly tolarate the mens now.With no variety in cash in and footnote title reigns It’s great if you like destruction Derby type matches . But with how poorly the winners have been treated. In recent years It makes me wonder why I should watch the match anymore.
To my earlier point about the womens MIITB You knew it’s a bad sign when the first ever match and how wwe feels about it when it was won by a man!
Yeah they treat it really weirdly. I’ve never gotten what their deal is with the fast cashins outside of Carmella.
Good article. I know you aren’t a fan of the Money In The Bank concept, but what do you think was the best use of the cash in since it all started?
Edge. Timed well, people didn’t see it coming, effective, set the tone for the idea going forward. Since then it has been WAY too much about the “OH WOW THEY ONLY WON IT LIKE AN HOUR AGO” or “HEY! DID YOU KNOW I STILL HAVE THIS” and then a three month wait before anything happens.
I don’t think WWE wants womens MIITB. They can bearly tolarate the mens now.With no variety in cash in and footnote title reigns It’s great if you like destruction Derby type matches . But with how poorly the winners have been treated. In recent years It makes me wonder why I should watch the match anymore.