Summerslam 2025 Night Two: The Great Carry Job

You may also like...

16 Responses

  1. Sebastian Howard says:

    ” I can absolutely see why Summerslam is going to be a two night event going forward ” Why? No one asked for Summerslam to be two nights, people weren’t even bitching that summerslam was too long like Mania. TKO literally just did it so they could get more money from overpriced tickets and more ad revenue thrown on the shows. If this show was one night it would’ve been awesome, especially if they had cut crap like the jelly roll tag match. Instead we got one lackluster night and one good night which is usually the case with these two night shows.

  2. Sebastian Howard says:

    “Overall Rating: B. It definitely wasn’t as strong as last night, but I had a good enough time with this show. ”

    Bro it was way better than last night. Last night was a bunch of matches no one cared about bookended by an atrocious punk match where he was gassed for half of it. This night had multiple matches to care about, the womens triple threat, tlc, lyra/becky, aj/dom and the main, which I had incredibly low standards for because the mania match was so bad, delivered in spades.

  3. Sebastian Howard says:

    “Rating: B. I’m not even going to try to defend this match, as it was a totally insane and ridiculous match (eight AA’s if you lost count) with nothing but ridiculous spots and kickouts. That being said, I was laughing my head off at some of this stuff, as they were leaning into the ridiculousness. That’s what it should have been and I liked it far more than I should have.”

    I thought the main event was really good, I get that they used a lot of finishers but its the two biggest stars in wwe in the main event of summerslam its ok for them do a lot of finishers. It also wasn’t JUST finishers like Orton/Cena at Backlash it was actually a great match with Cena busting his ass again. I really liked it, would give it an a. I also think that like because finishers are so overdone now that you have to hit a lot of them for the crowd to buy a false finish. This was WAY better than Punk/Walter last night.

  4. Greg says:

    HHH decides to end post show scrums right before Lesnar comes back. Good lord, what a coward. What’s your thoughts on Brock being back KB (if you feel comfortable sharing)? I don’t see why they needed to do this.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      On one hand, I was stunned by the music hitting because I wasn’t expecting it, but I’m not wild on Lesnar (and wasn’t before the Janel Grant stuff). He’s kind of done almost everything he can outside of putting some up and comers over. What he’s accused of doing isn’t on the same level as what Vince is accused of doing, but it’s not exactly something I’d want to have around a locker room. From a business standpoint I get it, but outside of Lesnar just doing some over the top stuff, I’m not overly interested.

      • Sebastian Howard says:

        bro the only thing she accused him of doing was getting a video of her pissing. That’s not even a cancable offense, wrestling fans are such liberal little bitches and want to cancel anyone for anything. I think a lot of them don’t even know what Lesnar actually did and how little involved he was. The only other thing that happened was apparently, again allegedly, he was supposed to bang her but got too drunk and went home on his jet. He never even met her irl and never had sex with her or anything. That’s another reason why I don’t buy that Vince put it in his contract that Lesnar was going to bang Grant, he never banged her.

        • Greg says:

          There are texts that show Lesnar knew of her and that Vince was offering her. I’m liberal but it has nothing to do with politics. This isn’t politics. This is about treating women correctly. Lesnar himself has admitted to some pretty bad things regarding women.

          I don’t care if he cheats on Sable. I don’t care if he likes women doing weird stuff on videos. That’s a personal choice, not my business.

          It also shows you know so little about the lawsuit. The lawsuit is over McMahon stopping the payments to her. Grant isn’t a cop and cannot do anything to charge him with a crime. As the son of a judge, this lawsuit will take some time and things will come out slowly, if at all. What we know about right now is a tiny fraction of everything that actually happened. What we do know about Lesnar’s involvement is a crime, even if he never had sex with her. Lesnar won’t be charged as again, that’s not what this is about.

          What McMahon had her sign an NDA about was actually illegal (you cannot pay someone to coverup crimes). However, that’s not what the case is about. My dad said he would not be surprised if Grant eventually settles and this goes away quietly. Unfortunately, unless you are rich, prolonging a court case will eventually end up costing more than what you could get. Bro.

          • Sebastian Howard says:

            uh I just sent a comment and it didn’t go through WTF kb. Ok lets focus on Grant’s accusations focusing on Lesnar not on vince to keep this focused. She said that Vince wrote into Lesnar’s contract that she was going to have sex with him however that’s highly questionable because he never had sex with her and never even met her irl. There was a day they were supposed to have sex but Lesnar got too drunk and went home on his jet. Then there’s the accusation that he asked for a video of her pissing and she sent him one. That’s it. None of this is a reason to cancel someone. He never met her, never had sex with her, wasn’t involved in sex trafficking. The only argument you seem to have is that in her accusations that he knew what was happening and talked to Vince so he should be cancelled. Ok well that’s not proven true and even if Lesnar knew that he was having sex with Grant that doesn’t mean he was involved at all or even knew to the full extent what was happening. Regardless Robert Karples, the guy behind the WWE Creative twitter and a former lawyer, already looked at the court case and said that Lesnar wasn’t going to be charged with anything because there’s nothing to charge him with. I’m not downplaying anything, Lesnar just wasn’t accused of doing anything. You seem to think he should be cancelled for knowing Vince was banging Grant or whatever, well according to her Vince also bragged about having sex with her and showed pictures of her to random production guys so do you think they should be fired too?

          • Sebastian Howard says:

            “The lawsuit is over McMahon stopping the payments to her. Grant isn’t a cop and cannot do anything to charge him with a crime. ” If Grant couldn’t get Vince in trouble why did he have her sign NDAs in the first place dumbass? She literally got Vince cancelled and kicked out of WWE just through unverified accusations. But that’s “consequence culture” right?

      • Sebastian Howard says:

        KB I don’t know from like an objective in ring perspective you’re not excited for Lesnar. His three match series with Cody was amazing and we all know he can have great matches with good opponents (rollins, aj, bryan, punk).

        • Thomas Hall says:

          I liked the Rhodes series well enough. Just a case of you know what you’re getting with him, which is only so interesting.

    • Sebastian Howard says:

      Greg you think Lesnar should get cancelled and not be allowed into WWE because he allegedly got a video of her pissing with no evidence? Do you also think that anyone who subscribes to Only Fans should be cancelled to?

      • Greg says:

        I responded to your other comment. You are trying to downplay what he actually did and comparing that to Only Fans is comparing apples to oranges. Not remotely similar.

        I hate people saying someone got cancelled. What is actually happening is called consequences. Actions have consequences.

        • Sebastian Howard says:

          That’s really dumb liberal propaganda. People get cancelled for ALLEGATIONS not for being proven of doing something wrong so its not consequences its cancelling someone for something they may or may not have done and assuming guilt before being proven guilty when you’re supposed to assume someone is innocent first. Remember when Enzo Amore was accused of rape and was fired from WWE before the case even started and then he came out squeaky clean and was proven innocent? How about Johnny Depp being cancelled for years (and still arguably cancelled now) even though he ended up being innocent and proven clean in case against Amber Heard? You’re one of those believe all women people even though there’s so many fake rape claims in the last 10 years and you refuse to acknowledge this or even agree that someone shouldn’t be cancelled before being proven guilty. An accusation is an accusation, someone can be accused of anything by anyone at any time it doesn’t mean shit until they’re y’know actually proven guilty.

          • Greg says:

            I’ll make this short. False rapes make up 8% of allegations. False allegations do happen. My sister was raped. I watched as people laughed at her, mocked her, called her a liar. My sister is not a liar. I’ll leave it at that.

          • Greg says:

            Since I can’t respond to your other comments, I’ll do it here. You once again do NOT know the case at all. Vince had her sign an NDA and paid her off to hopefully keep her quiet. As what happened could have led to consequences for Vince, which it did. Vince has done multiple deals in the past where he only makes an initial payment and then you have to sue him to get the rest. Cornette has talked about this. Had Vince just paid her what the contract said, we likely wouldn’t have heard about it. Vince got removed because he used company money to pay off crimes. Hell, he paid a fine to the SEC because of what he did.

            Lesnar won’t be charged with anything because he isn’t a part of the NDA. She isn’t suing him. We only know a tiny fraction of what actually happened. You ignored that part. What Lesnar did IS a crime. Like an actual crime. You literally even wrote exactly the part that is a crime. I’m not joking about that. I’m guessing you don’t understand what crime he committed and so are pretending he didn’t do one. Which, again, he did.

            The crime Vince did is much worse than Lesnar. If Vince isn’t being charged, Lesnar definitely will not be.

            Oh and this guy you are defending so much literally broke into Sable’s house after she broke up with him. He admitted to it. Swell guy.

            I’m done with you. You are not responding in good faith and will do mental gymnastics to defend evil people. Maybe look in the mirror at this one dude. You seem to fear women.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.