Impact – March 17, 2011: The Worst TV Show I Have Seen In Years

You may also like...

17 Responses

  1. newc868 says:

    Having watched the first 20 minutes of the show I was certainly surprised by Bubba and his mic skills compared with the others in the ring at time, he managed to convince me he was worth at least a No. 1 Contender’s match.

    That said, AJ Styles, Sting and the Tag Division are the only two things I really care about when it comes to TNA.

  2. KB, I know I’m looking far into the future with this question, but would you actually buy Bubba Ray as a World Heavyweight Champion?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I tend to be of the mindset that anyone can be built into a world champion (Miz and that rapper named Cena spring to mind), but at the same time Bubba has been around forever, he’s seen as a career tag team guy and the character is a bully. How far can you really go with that? I think I could see it happening, but I really don’t think people will buy it. The casual fan certainly won’t.

      • Heyo says:

        How do you feel about Bully Ray’s main event run in retrospect?

        • Thomas Hall says:

          Bully surprised me as he was actually perfect for the role. Other things outside his control got in the way though (namely Hogan leaving as Bully vs. Hulk probably should have main evented a pay per view) and of course it’s TNA so you have to expect them to screw something up. Bully completely exceeded my expectations though and it was a big success, at least by TNA standards.

  3. Boo Didley says:

    Not sure what the complaints are about your style of recap, but it fits well with the overall style of your site. Really appreciate and enjoy the old school reviews. Keep up the good work.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      My theory on reviews is simple: if you wanted to know who won, that’s what Wikipedia is for. I’ve watched wrestling for over 20 years and have seen over 50,000 matches. I know a good bit about this stuff and the point of a review is for me to add in my insight and my opinions about them. Otherwise, you could watch the match for yourself if you just wanted to know what happeend.

  4. elvylanda says:

    Part 2.

    “Watching fake wrestling on a fake wrestling show”
    – Vince Russo on Facebook back in 2010-

    I think Impact, or how they present Impact is more on developing characters and drama and storylines and behind the scenes conflict.

    I think TNA is trying to attract non wrestling fans or casual wrestlin fans to watch impact instead of wrestling fans who wnna see wrestling. They know those guys are going to show up, so let’s attract the other type of viewers who want to see more than just wrestling. Your thoughts on that.

    If, let’s say TNA continues on a trend of producing bad shows, how long do you see yourself doing recaps, is there a barometer for you before you give up on recaps?

    Keep up the good work.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      And how do they plan on doing that? By having boring/old characters not wrestle? Also, it hasn’t been working it seems. It worked in the 90s, but this isn’t the 90s. TNA doesn’t seem to get that.

      I’ll do recaps until there isn’t an Impact anymore.

  5. elvylanda says:

    Part 1

    What’s up Tommy! Let me give you these statement and see what you think of them. I have questions for you but reading the comments from the readers at the impact recap, a few of them make statements that I agree with. So here we go:

    “People [complain] about how theres not enough wrestling, but its called a BUILT SHOW.

    I remember a few weeks ago, Raw had only 16 min of wrestling on it. But not a lot of people here were complaining, as they said “its called building to wrestlemania”. But now the same people here are complaining when TNA are doing the same damn thing. Their building to Lockdown people.” – Pat

    For the past 4 weeks, Raw has been more storyline and angle and less wrestling. RAW has been doing the same thing, why Imapct gets trhe bad rating and not Raw?

    2- “Trying to give commentary and making grades trying to make yourself bigger than the show is getting more and more lame as the weeks go by.” -Rich-

    Now, I am not as harsh as Rich, everyone has a right to an opinion and I love free speech. But he brings up an interesting point, it seems more you are trying to get your style of writing over with the public ahead of writing a recap. It’s like a sports columnist trying to write a recap and editorializing instead just reporting the the facts. I apologize if I can’t explain that well.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      1. And what exactly is TNA building to? Victory Road with an 88 second main event? Lockdown with more of Angle vs. Jarrett? Impact with more non-finishes to their #1 contenders matches? Nowhere near the same thing.

      2. Everyone on that site puts grades on shows. I put more work and details into them and I miss nothing that goes on on those shows, period. I’ve heard this criticism over and over and yet no one can seem to point out where I do that. Interesting I’d think.

    • lol lol lol says:

      Oh hey check it out, it’s Elvylanda, aka TheMightyThanos, aka Chris Garcia.

  6. Felix says:

    Hey i came over from the 411 mania site when i saw your impact review.. i like your style, keep it up 🙂

  7. Lisa says:

    DAMN..taking all this a bit too personal or serious!?! LOL, take it easy, it’s wrestling!

  8. Jay says:

    I watched a little bit of this Show and then fell asleep. Only to wake up and see the ending with AJ getting powerbombed off the Stage. Just terrible stuff.

  9. Tiger says:

    Yeah, the spoilers sounded awful and the 40 minutes I saw of the show were the most boring thing I’ve watched in awhile. Those last ten minutes especially.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.