What Killed WCW (WCW Clue) Part 1

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. Anonymous says:

    Kellner killed off WCW for the same reason that CW canceled Smackdown a few years ago. Jamie Kellner hated wrestling and didn’t care that WCW still drew good ratings. Wrestling didn’t appeal to the female audience that he wanted to reach, so it didn’t belong on his network.

    Kellner’s decision to kill off WCW hurt AOL Time Warner financially. Eric Bischoff was offering more money than Vince offered, so long as he had TV programs. WCW’s lack of profitability at that time was primarily due to bad contracts and AOL Time Warner ended up paying the bad contracts. It isn’t easy to replace a program that draws a 3.0 rating every week, so AOL Time Warner ended up with lower ratings and less ad revenue because of Kellner.

    Given the fact that WWF collapsed to the mid 3s by 2002 and that WCW had developed a new generation of young stars and Bischoff had planned to push the Cruiserweights (AJ Styles and Christopher Daniels among them) and RVD (the top star in wrestling in that era) was going to sign with WCW, this company could have easily turned it around in a year. Realistically, the WWF (soon WWE) would have been worse off without Booker T, RVD, the Cruiserweights, and the other WCW stars that they acquired due solely to Jamie Kellner. By the way, WCW had also signed a young wrestler by the name of James Storm, although he never really debuted for them.

    A likely scenario if Bischoff bought WCW is that WCW becomes the #1 company again by mid-2003. WCW continues to aggressively scout the indies for up-and-coming talent and signs up most of the top indy stars of the 2000s (CM Punk, Samoa Joe, Austin Aries, Bryan Danielson).

    Claiming that David Arquette as WCW Champion killed WCW is ridiculous. Yes, WCW’s ratings dropped in mid-2000. The problem was that the ratings drop occurred in June, weeks after Arquette had already lost the title. The ratings eventually came back to the same level and only dropped off again in October, by which point rumors of WCW’s upcoming sale were rampant. Obviously, a company that is in limbo for a period of months is going to have its ratings decline, but on the Nitro where they said they would finally announce the new owners, the rating returned to the same range it had been in previously.

    By the time TNA began, the WCW audience was basically gone. If you quit watching wrestling altogether for a year, you aren’t going to hear about the launch of a new promotion. Actually, TNA didn’t have television at all until more than 3 years after WCW’s demise (Fox Sports Net) and it was 4 and a half years until TNA debuted on Spike TV. There was no way that TNA was going to be competitive with the WWE having to build an audience and with a much weaker roster than a Bischoff-owned WCW would have had. It was late 2007 before TNA got a 2nd hour and had a roster loaded with starpower. Since then, they’ve done very well just holding steady as the abortive boom of the 2000s turned into a severe downturn for the wrestling industry (WWE’s ratings dropped and the indy DVD sales market dried up). Even if TNA hadn’t made any mistakes at all, they wouldn’t be competitive with the WWE right now.

    WCW’s ratings also were pretty much the same during Russo’s run as head booker as they were before. Ratings dropped a little bit after Russo got fired. The Radicalz left because Vince Russo was fired and replaced by Kevin Sullivan. Benoit and Sullivan had a mutual hatred going back to when Sullivan booked his own divorce.

    WCW ratings peaked in January of 1999. They drew a 5.0 3 out of 4 weeks that month (Raw drew a 5.5 or so every week that month, but WWF were 2 months away from the start of their peak that lasted until the middle of 2000). Their ratings started to decline below the 4 range (where WCW had been in late 1997 and all of 1998) in April of 1999. WCW lost around a quarter of their audience during the pre-Russo period in 1999.

    You can make as eloquent an argument as you like for the smark conventional wisdom, but facts are stubborn things. The real causes of WCW’s demise were 1) the awful pre-Russo period in 1999, 2) firing Vince Russo in January 2000, an 3) Jamie Kellner canceling WCW because he hated wrestling. The end of Goldberg’s streak could easily be added as a 4th factor because once Goldberg lost he could never be undefeated again. WCW fans wanted to see Goldberg, so he shouldn’t have lost a match at all until the fans got tired of his act. If Goldberg was still the undefeated champion of WCW, the fans would have continued to watch WCW during the awful period.

    Look up the ratings for WCW at the Wikipedia article on the Monday Night War. The fact that there is no ratings support for your theories refutes them. If WCW fans are tuning out because David Arquette is the champion, you won’t expect to see WCW ratings holding steady during that period. If a wrestling show is turning off viewers, that would be reflected in the ratings immediately. If the ratings are steady, that refutes the claim that [whatever] is turning off viewers.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Well done. You’ve somehow determined the conclusion of the whole article before it’s done. That’s impressive. Give me a break.

  2. Jay says:

    Good Article and I loved the comparisons of Drew Carey & David Arquette. Drew Carey was in the Royal Rumble for a few minutes,was in & out. WCW making Arquette the Champion was just a desperate attempt to gain attention and it BOMBED.

  3. Vermen says:

    Uh…I think a guy named RD Reynolds already covered this stuff.

  4. Vega says:

    Great read, but when was Rick Steiner world champion? I didn’t know about that, and we’re talking about a time where he’d been 25ish.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Rick never had the title put on him. Dusty Rhodes was going to put it on him but the idea was vetoed and Dusty was fired for coming up with a crazy idea like that.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.