Slammiversary 2006: Another Montreal Ending

You may also like...

7 Responses

  1. Wim Boeren says:

    Because I wanted to know what parts to watch. Unrealistic? How is it unrealistic? If you can write a review without spoilers from a current show then there’s not reason why you couldn’t do the same from a show from years ago.
    If I write a review of Citizen Kane I’m not gonna write “Rosebud is the sled” and if I write a review from Fight Club I’m not gonna write that Brad Pitt was all in his imagination. Dear God I hope no first viewer is gonna read this comment.

    • Marky-Marc says:

      Spoilers?!? Wtf

    • Timmy says:

      Movie reviews are different. They get early access and put out reviews ahead of the movie. It’s also a tradeoff. Early movie access in exchange for publicity. Duh they wouldn’t spoil it. KB doesn’t get shows ahead of their release. You are looking for a non-spoiler match listing, no one does non-spoiler wrestling show reviews (as far as I know).

      I’ve never seen those movies. I also don’t care that you spoiled it. Why? CAUSE THEY ARE OLD.

      I read KB’s cause I fast forward a lot and he fills in the gaps. He also reviews shows I would never watch but am interested in (WCW 2000).

  2. Wim Boeren says:

    You start a review by spoiling three things? The first spoiler is in the title and the next two spoilers are in your opening. Why for god’s sake would you do that???
    And don’t tell me because it’s a review of a 10 year old show because for some people this is the first time they watch it. Or is it so hard for you to understand that new tna fans might want to watch the history of the show?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I really don’t think it’s a spoiler for a show that aired that long ago.

      • Wim Boeren says:

        Again, it doesn’t matter how long ago it was. The ony thing that matters is whether the person who reads it already knew it or not.

        • Timmy says:

          Uh, no. Why did you click on this review if you wanted to be surprised?

          Plus, as he mentioned, THIS IS FROM 2006! Expecting him to not spoil anything from a show that is TEN YEARS OLD is unrealistic.

Leave a Reply to Thomas Hall Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.