Impact Wrestling – April 11, 2013: The Best Big Show In A Long Time

You may also like...

10 Responses

  1. Chrisman says:

    There is just something very entertaining about Bully Ray, and fortunately for TNA, him and Hardy have great chemistry. Also, you’ve got AJ and Storm set up for a potentially great feud. Things have kind of fallen into place nicely for TNA right about now. Their 2 main feuds have some decent drama to them and it’s a huge contrast to WWE which is looking a bit lame and lacking direction.

    If TNA decide to feud Roode and Aries anytime soon then they’ve got a pretty awesome line-up. Plus you’ve got Daniels and Kazarian who are kind of treading water waiting to be put into something meaningful. Whereas WWE has Ziggler, who they’ve made look like a dork, and a load of very basic cut-out characters. Cena is their biggest star, and he kind of sums up the WWE – slightly lost, waiting for direction. Orton can’t get any serious action – why? Del Rio, Punk, Cena…there’s talent there, but the booking sucks.

  2. MikeCheyne says:

    This was indeed a good show; wrestling-wise, it was much better than Raw. On a “wow, live TV, what’s gonna happen next?” level, Raw won out, but Impact had a really good title “TLC” type match, a good tag team title match…and well, that was it, aside from a short Knockouts match. Still, those two matches trump anything seen on Raw and the storylines were better.

  3. Jay H says:

    Yet TNA is doing a re-hash of WCW vs nWo with TNA vs Aces/Eights. They are also re-doing the Sting recruiting War that WCW did with AJ Styles playing the part of Sting this time.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Yes, they’re redoing a storyline from 16 years ago. I think it’s ok at this point.

    • Jordan says:

      This is clearly the first instance that a wrestling company has re-done or borrowed a storyline from another company. The E surely hasn’t done it ever, nope.

  4. TNA writers are doing a better job with their product than WWE is doing with theirs. And one of those areas that TNA does a much better job than WWE is the ability to get you to invest in their characters. What I mean is that TNA has built a roster where they can swap people in and out of the main event and the mid-card because they do a great job of keeping most of their guys competitive.

    In the WWE, if you aren’t a Punk, Cena, HHH or Undertaker, you will go through the cycle of getting pushed then buried, rinse and repeat. Just when you think you can invest in a guy like Ziggler, then he gets squashed like a loser only to then turn around and become World Champion and all of a sudden we’re supposed to think he’s a threat. And then they book all their undercard champions to lose every match that isn’t a title defense. It’s ridiculous.

    In summary, WWE is in cruise control and has been for a long time because of no real competition. TNA has more to fight for and they are turning out much more compelling television.

    • Eric says:

      That’s every company buddy. At this time last year, Bobby Roode was world champion. This year, he just lost the Tag Titles and was pinned by Chavo Guerrero. There’s only 1 title in this company and only two in WWE. Thus, there are only two top spots as there’s a champion and top challenger. When you aren’t one of those, you are something below it. That’s just how wrestling works.

  5. Kobiyasho says:

    A-? Really? It appears Klunder has become a Tna mark, as always overrating the show. Klunder gave raw a C+ but gave this ok impact a A-. Klunder always complains about how wwe always has the same matches over and over, yet when tna does it he doesn’t complain. Klunder boy you and your reviews absolutely suck! Nothing interesting happened in this show except for the tlc, that’s the only thing worth checking out.

    • Mike says:

      KB reviews WRESTLING not crowd reactions which is basically the only reason why RAW was any good. (Along with Ziggler cash in) so it got a C+. Did RAW have any matches that came close to a B? Nope. It was full of squashes, bad or whyisthismatchhappening matches and one decent title match.

      This show had two B TV matches that were built up for 3 weeks which is ages in TV wrestling weeks. RAW hardly ever promotes next weeks matches. Everything was also set for next week pretty nicely too.

      What is set for next week on RAW? Why Ryback why? That is all.

    • Remy says:

      I gave it a B.

Leave a Reply to Jay H Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.