Monday Nitro – August 17, 1998: An Old Painted Face

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. Sroxy says:

    I believe Hogan says that because it is actually not advisable to mention on air that you already beat the opponent. Why would I want to buy a ticket or watch the match again if you said that you already beat him once before? Moreover, why do you even want a have a match now that you said that you have already beaten the guy? That is why it was “an ultimate no-no’.

    However, if it would have been a reverse situation with Warrior saying that I have never beaten you Hogan, and I want a match now to avenge my loss, THAT would make the fans interested in wanting to pay to watch the match. Here, it was like, I have beaten you Hogan, I was better than you, well now I want to fight you again because….well I want to. That’s not compelling.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Warrior is one of the few men that has beaten Hogan. He’s done it once so he can do it again now. Hogan didn’t mind selling that same story at SuperBrawl 1997 after Piper beat him at Starrcade 1996. Like I said, if they’re going to reference the match, are we just supposed to pretend like it didn’t happen?

  2. ted says:

    ” He mentions that Hogan never beat the Warrior, which brings up an interesting point.
    On Warrior’s WWE DVD, Hogan said this was the ultimate no-no.”

    I Guess Hogan’s losses actually do bother him. Or did at the time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.