Smackdown – June 6, 2014: He Left For This?

You may also like...

21 Responses

  1. Jay H. (the real one) says:

    The problem with Batista is he just came back in the wrong year. If he had come back at anytime but this year I think he would have been fine. The good thing is that they turned him Heel and reformed Evolution. I think once the Movie comes out he’ll be back again

    As for the Seth Rollins stuff im sure we’ll get a more elaborate explanation on Monday when Dean Ambrose & Roman Reigns are there.

  2. M.R. says:

    Anyone that would argue Batista was never a big deal would be an idiot.

    • Ted says:

      Ever time you write your always a jackass. Now about Batista he has already proven he isn’t needed. He was gone four years and not one person missed him. He came back and added nothing. He’s left again proving the urgent need for him on the shows. He’s not important anymore period. Also his hot streak was what a year at most? Now don’t get me wrong he’s not the worst by any stretch of the imagination. I think the wwe overestimated his worth.

  3. zappa says:

    Bring Batista. I want him brought right here, with a big ribbon on his head, and I want to look him straight in the eye and I want to tell him what a cheap, lying, no-good, rotten, four-flushing, low-life, snake-licking, dirt-eating, inbred, overstuffed, ignorant, blood-sucking, dog-kissing, brainless, dickless, hopeless, heartless, fat-ass, bug-eyed, stiff-legged, spotty-lipped, worm-headed sack of monkey shit he is! Hallelujah! Holy shit!

  4. ted says:

    So yes it didn’t work. Also You think fans will care when he comes back again? Isn’t it more likley he simply isn’t a big deal anymore? Some would argue he was never really was. Yes he was hot for a year in 2005. But no one was clamoring for a Batista return, when he left the first time. The skinny jeans don’t help matters.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      He’s still a deal because of what he was in the past, but no he’s nowhere near as big of a deal as he used to be. He’ll be good as a heel for awhile but the face push was just the wrong idea.

  5. Thomas Hall says:

    Batista was there to be a big deal but the fans weren’t interested. They had to call an audible by putting him in Evolution again and now he can come back in a few months when the fans aren’t only interested in Daniel Bryan.

  6. M.R. says:

    My problem with Evolution has been they’ve made Triple H out to be the leader, a guy who’s gonna go back to being a part timer soon. They should’ve let H be the mouth piece, but build the group with Orton front and center and let him come out of this looking like a megaheel.

    • ted says:

      Or you could not recycle a 10 year old idea, and do something new?

      Also what was even the point of Batista coming back? Can we call that a failure? He wins the rumble that no one wanted him to. Does three jobs and quits?

      • Heyo says:

        To be fair, Batista is most likely going to be on a big press tour for Guardians of the Galaxy, so it makes sense that he’s going to be gone for a while.

        What does NOT make sense was why he won the Rumble regardless of that.

        ….

        Actually, I’m not complaining about that mess. WWE took the whole mess of a situation and gave us WrestleMania 30, with a great opener and main event, with one hell of a way to end it. So yeah…

        • ted says:

          This doesn’t explain the necessity of Batista. It felt like the story could have been done without him. He was shoehorned in it seemed. His whole involvement seemed unnecessary, and now that he is gone. He will prove he isn’t needed.

  7. whosnext98 says:

    I’m convinced Rollins’ turn was nothing more than a lame attempt to keep Evolution going ten years past it’s sell date to feed Trips’ ego.

    • Killjoy says:

      Clearly.

    • whatta pile of crap!

      What ego is this. This is HHH last few matches, Bryan (WM) – lost, Shield I (ER) – lost, Shield II (PB) – lost.

      Joining evolution might well turn out to be a drag – who knows – but to bring Trips ego to justify that is where you are wrong

      • whosnext98 says:

        If you can’t be civil I suggest you find someone else to respond to. Wins and losses are meaningless. Ego is all about keeping your face on TV and storylines revolving around you. Ego is all about who comes out on top in feuds regardless of whether you win any matches or not.

  8. Killjoy says:

    I’m still convinced the turn is some elaborate trap.

  9. M.R. says:

    So why the hell did Rollins turn? I hope they’re planning on supplying some logic to the story and not just chalk it up to wrestling laws.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      To shock people and hopefully pop a rating because Memorial Day is no longer an acceptable excuse for a bad rating.

  10. deanerandterry says:

    I’m starting to think this Rollins heel turn was done in hopes to benefit Reigns, not Rollins, a way of stacking the odds against Ambrose and Reigns so Reigns can take them all down 1 by 1. I really hope I’m wrong because Rollins deserves better than Evolutions lackey.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.