Wrestler of the Day – October 13: Velvet Sky

You may also like...

21 Responses

  1. Ted says:

    You mean biased?

    Well it’s one thing to not like women’s wrestling that’s fair enough. I’ve just noticed a comment of yours about how a female wrestler should just stay naked. This doesn’t strike you as sexist

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I don’t recall saying that.

      Here’s the thing though: women’s wrestling, save for big stretches for Chyna, Lita and Trish, does not draw. Why bother trying to do something that has no track record of working and shift away from something that has a track record of at least giving people a breather? I don’t suggest the girls stay at T&A because they’re girls. I suggest it because they don’t add much to the show otherwise.

      • ted says:

        Lockdown 2005 Review

        “Traci comes in again and AGAIN gets shoved out. Just stay naked honey.”

        Seems more than a little sexist to me.

        But it wouldn’t hurt to try something else with at least one female wrestler. Track record may not be on their side. But that doesn’t mean you can’t create an over female wrestler. Who is known for something other than having breasts.

  2. Thomas Hall says:

    Sexist or based on gender? Those are two very different things.

  3. Thomas Hall says:

    To a degree though it was nothing compared to some of the things you hear about.

    That being said, I’ve never seen the need for the anti-bullying crusade, at least not to the extent it’s going to. It’s one thing if someone is being beaten up or insulted relentlessly, but there are some situations where a person needs to have a thicker skin. Also if people were serious about dealing with it, they might try doing something besides having D-list celebrities tell them it’s bad or signing some stupid pledge.

  4. M.R. says:

    Not exactly sure I’d call men interested in watching women wrestle in tight, skimpy outfits as opposed to a great technical bout the “lowest common denominator.” Women’s wrestling, much like most women’s sports, just doesn’t draw.

  5. Eric says:

    The biggest problem with her career is that she got crazy over but since it’s TNA, new babyface stars aren’t allowed. They delayed her winning he title, had her do it with the focus on Karen Jarrett, and then lost it a month later because Gail Kim needed another title reign. That was the end of her which is a shame because she was popular and with her looks, probably marketable.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Egads with Gail Kim and all her title reigns. She’s good in the ring but man alive do those get boring.

      Agreed on Sky for the most part. People were getting behind her, but I never bought into her being bullied in high school. I find it a stretch to believe that someone that good looking who was into athletics was often bullied. Maybe she was but I never bought it.

      • Eric says:

        Eh, people were into her because she looked good and she worked hard for a long time. The bullying thing (ironic given who she’s dating now) was just the short term storyline to culminate years of struggle to the top……and then Gail Kim came back and It all fell apart.

  6. Ted says:

    It probably shouldn’t? That’s a poor choice of words you’ve got there.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Not really. The girls are rarely going to draw a crowd with their wrestling abilities so being there for your looks is better than nothing else.

    • ted says:

      Or you could hire girls who know what they’re doing. Instead of pandering to the lowest common denominator.

      This isn’t hard. Find women that are capable of having good matches and projecting personality and push them.

  7. ted says:

    “Still though, she’s nice to look at and that’s the point of women’s wrestling more often than not.”

    It shouldn’t be.

Leave a Reply to Eric Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.