Reviewing the Review: Royal Rumble 2015

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. rampah says:

    Firstly I want to apologize for my bad english. It isn’t my first language and I dropped out of school nearly eleven years ago, so it’s a long time since I’ve written more than a few words together in it.

    Well then.
    I might be what people think of as a casual wrestling fan. I’ve never been at a wrestling show and I was a whole more into wrestling when I was a boy. But I’m hitting 30 this year and I realized that the current product isn’t really aimed at guys my age. However it still entertained me over the years. Although I’ve never seen a show live (mainly due to the time gap here in germany) and always whatched only parts of raw (fast forward is a bliss), I was always able to find fun in the product.
    I used to watch the PPVs the week after they aired, when I find the time to watch three hours. I avoided spoilers and reading reviews for those few days between, so the PPVs still held exitement for me.
    But in the Rumble to Mania period in 2013 that changed for me. Since then I only watched the big fours (Royal Rumble, Wrestlemania, Summerslam, Survivor Series) spoilerfree. And I also tend to use the fast forward button way more often today.

    The Rumble itself was always my favorite WWF/WWE show. Not Mania, not Summerslam. But since 2013 the rumble matches keep getting more and more boring for me.
    Yes, the idea that “anyone could win” is dead longer than that. But until 2013 it wasn’t so painful obvious for me who was winning.

    I remember in 2013 the annoying “not really once in a lifetime” storyline, written all over the place. It made the rumble less interesting, because I knew, no matter what, John Cena would “overcome the odds”. I haven’t watched the match lately, but I remember it being not that bad until the (at least for me) incredible boring and anti-climate paring witch Cena and Ryback. There was just no way that Ryback (or any other superstar not named Cena) would win this and that killed the exitement for me.

    In 2014, Batista came back. I thought, they couldn’t be so stupid to not include Bryan in the match. But that moment, when Rey Mysterio’s music hit…awful. And when Punk was tossed out, simply any tension was gone.
    Two years in a row the rumble resulted in boring predictabillity. And that is the worst that could happen to a match like the rumble: Boring. When people you don’t like win, it is part of the product and doesn’t need to be bad. But when you know what is going to happen, because they promote a rematch in some strange overhyped buildup or the momentum of a upcoming Disney movie, it gets bad.

    Now 2015. I believe when you will do the review again next year, it will be an D- or even worse.
    It stands out in particular of being the worst or second to worst rumble to me because of so many reasons:
    – Why are Miz and Truth starting? Why not Miz and Mizdow? Or some other two that have actually heat for another and the fans care about?
    – Bully Ray is brought back as an ECW original. Yes that was decent, as he might me the ex-ECW wrestler in the best shape as of today. But why not include Devon? Why don’t have a showdown with the Wyatts vs the Dudleys? The moment was there but it ended poorly.
    – The returning names with exception of Bully Ray didn’t create that much impact. Those returns can really put a rumble way up, but not so this year. DDP was nice to see, but after that literally nothing happened in that field. And he came in at #14 or #15 I believe.
    – The moment when Bryans’ legs hit the floor, any doubt for me was gone considering the win of Reigns. And he wasn’t even into the match at that point because it really was that early. Combine that with no more nostalgia returns and the rumble mood was gone.
    – The Mizdow segment was incredibly stupid. You have a guy that is really funny in this character and over with the fans and an awesome (hehe) heel in Miz. The story of “the Miz screws Mizdow” here writes itself, hell maybe if you don’t want to go that route keep him at least a few minutes in the ring to capitalitze on the momentum and make it more entertaining.
    – Why exactly were the three “fired” guys in the rumble when they are booked like this? They were just there and left absolutely no impact in that way.
    – The worst part of it, was the dominance of the washed up giants. I like both of them but that was just to much for me. It was just boring to see them eliminating one guy after another with so little effort. The second most over guy in the rumble? Here you go Dolph, you had your five minutes of doing nothing of note. Iron man Bray Wyatt? He can last that long but simply is no match for the power of the giants. And the list goes on. It made the last part of the rumble so boring and combined with the EPIC argument between Show and Kane (Who could have seen that coming?) and the overall predictability of Reigns winning it just became dull. It didn’t really make Reigns look good too. He seemed to barely survive against those two until his cousin had to rescue him in a cheesy moment.
    – Rusevs awesome return made him look like a stupid goof. This has to be the only time I heard an american crowd cheering for a russian character.

    I thought before the rumble that they booked themselves in a corner with only one world title and just 2 1/2 men that were serious contenders (Reigns, Bryan and a possible returning Orton).
    But I didn’t think it would become this boring, and that after last year.

    Yes, people will watch Wrestlemania anyway. But I think stuff like that hurts the interest for other PPVs way more, and especially the rumble itself.

    The tag matches are forgettable, but the triple threat was gold. All three men came out of it looking like legit world champions, thats very good.
    But the inclusion also showed, how Lesnar has been wasted in that dull rematches with HHH and Cena. Yes, the outcome could always have been mediocre matches like the one with Taker. But when you use the idea of having a guy fight only once each few months as a special attraction, the pairings should have been special attractions too. If Lesnar leaves after Mania, there will likely have been no Lesnar vs Orton, Lesnar vs Bryan, etc. and that is a shame, because the possibility was there.

    PS: Keep up the good work. I often enjoy reading the reviews here more than watching the show itself.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Your English was fine by the way.

      To quickly go over some of your complaints, Truth started because he can get fans into a match quickly. It’s the same reason he opens a lot of house shows.

      As for D-Von, it simply may have been he didn’t want to appear. That’s something a lot of fans forget: it’s not always WWE’s idea. HHH covered this in his Austin podcast. They’ll call someone up and say “We want you in the Hall of Fame.” “No.” “Uhhhh….ok.” It’s not always on WWE.

      The fired story has been going in circles for weeks. I really don’t get why Rowan wasn’t just in the Rumble officially as it’s not like Axel did anything of note with it. Agreed on the way they’re being used though, but that might be more that I’m sick of the story.

      I’m fine with Lesnar being around every now and then, but having him as champion this long is a problem.

      Overall, you’re absolutely right on the lack of drama hurting things. That’s fine every once in a while but like you said, this is the third straight year with no question as to who is winning. I can accept Rock vs. Cena II as the first one was such a huge money maker for them that the sequel made sense. Last year thankfully they called an audible for Bryan. THis year though…..yeah. Reigns is popular but not to the degree they’re hoping for. He isn’t being pushed like a superstar but that’s the reaction he’s expected to get. I don’t care for it either.

      Thanks. I’ll be doing these as long as people read them.

      • rampah says:

        I guess D-Von not being avaiable is the most logical reason.

        It’s not, that Truth didn’t do bad as an entrant from the start (actually I think he’s great on the mic, and didn’t know that with the house shows and it makes sense). But when two people with a fresh feud or a longtime rivalry start, it sets for a great beginning. The last years were always great in this with 2014 Punk/Rollins, 2013 Jericho/Ziggler, 2012 Miz/Riley and 2011 Punk/Bryan, this year felt somehow underwhelming.

        The championship issue has become a mess. With only one world title (and the urge to keep the value of the Intercontinental title low) that really wasn’t the best idea. But what annoys me more is the fact, that Lesnar has had 4 Matches with Cena and 3 with HHH since he returned. And there were a lot of fresh and believable options for him. I could have undestood one match and in the case of Cena two. But the two more HHH snorefests and the Cena rematch were pointless. And Rollins showed how well even “small” names could have done with him.

        I liked Rock/Cena I. Epic buildup, very good match. But this “Cena has to redeem himself, because he had such a bad year in 2012″…it just didn’t interest me at all. I would compare it to the situation today, that I wouldn’t want Bryan vs The Authority again. It was done shortly before with very, very much time. I didn’t need to see it again. Combine that with two athor rematches in HHH/Lesnar and Punk/Taker, which both had a very biased buildup so there was no doubt who was winning, and WM29 felt like “meh” to me.
        Cena could have gone over Rock the year before, if needed that much, leaving Rock/Lesnar as an big money match. Punk/Taker could have been Title-Streak vs WM-Streak without Bearer involved. Or do HHH/Punk and Cena/Taker, etc.
        To this day WM29 seems like a turning point to me. Rock hasn’t wrestled a match since then, the Lesnar match was in that form a waste, Taker was still in shape, Punk still there and not yet loosing his smile.
        Yeah, Captain Hindsight is strong but the following title reigns by Cena (same old stuff, but the one Henry promo was awesome), Orton (great work by him, but overshadowed by the omnipresent authority), Bryan (injury sucks and thus ending in Cena again) and Lesnar (leaving without title matches) have all been underwhelming to me and I keep loosing my interest for the product as a whole.

        I know that another turning point will come and it will get interesting for me again eventually. But more of all I would like an entertaining rumble match or an interesting booked Survivor Series. Mania will be solid every year, there simply is too much money to be made, that they won’t put the effort in it.

  2. good read. and agree 100%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.