Fast Lane 2015: The Best Commercial I’ve Ever Seen

You may also like...

42 Responses

  1. ted says:

    Nope Reigns proves he still isn’t ready. Byran proves he is more than ready and not being given the opportunity. The you will like Reings because I say so train continues.

  2. Acuzzam says:

    Great review KB. I agree with you in everything this time.

  3. Derek Hamel says:

    I’m a Daniel Bryan fan and I’d like to see him in the main event at Mania. But not because I want him to win every match or be in every main event. I just believe he’d provide the best match possible of anybody on the roster.

  4. Rocko says:

    I’m fine with HHH’s statements. Obviously he is just saying that he killed WCW for storyline purposes.

    Bryan should have won this. I still don’t feel like Reigns is ready to main event mania. It’s not that it needs to be Bryan, it just needs to be someone more ready than Reigns.

    Taker’s last match should have been last year. Otherwise breaking the streak was pointless.

  5. M.R. says:

    Triple H saying “it was guys like me that killed WCW” or whatever isn’t that far off. He wasn’t a big part but he contributed to a fun midcard.

    Cena defeating Rusev at Mania would be high comedy just for the fact that he beat Wyatt last year and totally derailed him for months.

    How was Orton’s reaction?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      The idea that any single person not named Austin or McMahon put WCW out of business is laughable. WCW did most of the damage to themselves.

      There’s a difference though: Rusev won the first match. That’s a big key difference.

      It was fine, though it came after a ridiculous moment.

      • M.R. says:

        He didn’t say he single-handedly did it, he said it was guys like him. As long as he knows that list reaches about eight before it gets to him then the statement holds true.

        And I completely disagree. The Mania win is the one that matters. Plus it’s not as if Cena tapped or got pinned, last night was essentially a draw.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          It’s HHH. He and Stephanie single handedly did everything, including saving kittens and making pancakes for the homeless in Zimbabwe.

          That’s assuming Cena wins at Wrestlemania.

  6. Jacob Jones says:

    So you’re admitting that you didn’t watch the show but you still claim that it was bad?…..Should I take this under concern?

  7. Vega says:

    Apparently there is an internal order that odd number Manias have to be bad.

    Reigns beating Bryan is fine in theory, but thanks for destroying the Running Knee and Yes Lock on the way. Do you really want the people’s favorite endorsing the company’s favorite after-match to be accompanied by boos? Whatever, it’s what we get. Person we’re booing, save the title for us.

    Funniest thing would be Lesnar retaining and Seth cashing in so nobody actually gets to slay Brock. That’s exactly the thing this company might do: make everyone look second-rate to the clearly demotivated part-timer and have nobody get real comeuppance.

    I’m curious if we get Sheamus – Bryan at Mania, or in 16-years-ago terms Test – Austin to compliment Nash – Goldberg main eventing.

  8. Da Prophet says:

    Bryan going for the triangle choke should have been a bigger deal. Nobody picked up on it on commentary. I like to think it was a nice little nod to Silva/Sonnen because Reigns was relaxed in the guard and left his arm exposed for Bryan to go for the submission off his back.

  9. Heyo says:

    I heard people accuse Bryan fans of being all “BRYAN BRYAN BRYAN, NOBODY IS ALLOWED TO GO OVER OTHER THAN BRYAN” and I can totally see that argument getting a lot of fuel, based on what I’ve heard about the main event and the backlash that’s already starting.

    Now, let’s be VERY clear. I’m a Daniel Bryan fan. I think he should have won the Rumble and main evented Wrestlemania, and the neck injury totally set up a redemption storyline. But I’m afraid that Reigns could put on a 5 star performance that makes WM 25 HBK/Taker look like child’s play and he would still be hated by the IWC, simply because he’s not Bryan.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Here’s the thing that gets old more than anything: Bryan had his moment, and it was absolutely perfect. The matches were great, the story was great, even Cole’s call of “it’s a miracle on Bourbon Street!” was great.

      And almost none of the “fans” are satisfied with it. “But he didn’t get a year long title reign! WE HAVE TO DO IT AGAIN!” Wrestlemania XXX took eight months to set up. I really don’t need to see it all over again. Find a new story and get Bryan back to the top that way. He can and probably will win the title later on. It doesn’t have to be the centerpiece of Wrestlemania all over again.

      • F5 says:

        Here we go with the pretense and elitism. “Fans”? I know you were around for Austin and what happened with his fans. Austin won 2 rumbles in a row and tons of championships, and beat everyone. So stop pretending this is any different.

        But no, you’d rather suck Vince’s roidy cock than actually grow a brain and realize how stupid you and others are whom defend this booking.

        Denying Brian’s fans is exactly the same as denying Austins. When Austin “had his moment” it wasn’t over. Him wining at Mania wasn’t the “end of the story”, and anyone who says the same about Bryan is an idiot. It was only the beginning.

        WWE is killing themselves and their company by not listening to their fans no matter what, even when they, hardcore AND CASUALS ALIKE forced Bryan down their throats last year, they STILL MADE THE SAME MISTAKE and had REIGNS BEAT HIM.

        CM Punk was right. Professional Wrestling will die on Vince and Paul’s watch. The only way that it can be saved and the course corrected at this point is if their private jet crashes into a mountain and Shane comes back, hires Jim Ross and Paul Heyman to run the show, and gets out of the way.

        Anything else and this profession you make your living off of being ignorant and ass kissing about is going to die. It might as well be to most fans who long since left anyway.

        • Jacob Jones says:

          Debate etiquette can go either way. Right now you’re going the way in which your kettle is thunder cloud black.

      • ted says:

        I agree with f5 This reigns experiment is further proof that Vince and co think they know better than the fans. It’s like Vince wants to prove he still has one over the fans before he dies. Sad really. The company is being told what to do to make the fans happy and are purposely ignoring it. What company would do that?

  10. Jay H (the real one) says:

    Does anyone honestly listen to this idiot above me?

    I gotta say kudos to WWE for sticking to the original plan all along. I thought they would go the Triple Threat route again but im not even mad. DB will be Champion again at some point this year I think. A middle of the road PPV but it wasn’t bad either.

    • F5 says:

      Does anyone even bother to listen to a loser who has nothing better to do than to make 20 different names pretending not to be himself on the website of some nobody from a wrestling forum?

      No, they don’t. I know I’m not stupid, so your ad hominems and indirect attacks don’t work. You just have an entire history of comments on this site to prove my point against you.

      Does that sting, idiot?

      • Jay H (the real one) says:

        Actually im not the one who’s been making 20 names on this site to make fun of myself. Try again idiot.

      • Jay H (the real one) says:

        Also I honestly don’t know why you continue to comment on this Site. Since all you do is call everyone names and pretend to be a tough guy behind a computer screen.

    • Hubcap Dave says:

      Would love to see a conversation between him and gracie…..

  11. F5 says:

    The hotshotting of Reigns to the title is nearly complete. The dude has been thrown into the picture faster than Ultimate Warrior or Goldberg, and they had a much better roster to work with and a crowd that actually wanted them. Both were probably better workers too.

    WWE is making up for the correction of their mistake last year in a big way. Let’s see if Vince can have his wet dream of the Bryan/Sheamus rematch now, and let’s see if everyone sits on their hands when Reigns pins the former, actually legitimate UFC Champion in Lesnar.

    But at least there’s the disciple of the HHH school of cutting promos with a dick stuck in their mouth in Rollins to cash in his money in the bank and make the whole night and Undertaker’s streak an anti-climax.

    And Vince and HHH inject each other full of steroids in the back while telling everyone that WWE is “drug free”, and 60+ year old men being on the cover of Muscle and Fitness is totally normal.

    Boy, do I love this new era of profession… Sports Enter…. WWE…?

    • Eric says:

      To be fair, it’s not faster than Goldberg. Goldberg literally had the title in his hands within 2 years of first stepping foot in a wrestling ring FOR TRAINING. Reigns started training like 5 years ago.

      • F5 says:

        It’s a different system then it was back then, people would debut for training on the main roster. Nobody counted OVW for Lesnar either, or Warrior’s time before he was signed in WWE.

        Reigns hasn’t been a single’s star anywhere near long enough as they had been, and on top of that he spent the other time on the active roster being protected by 2 better workers in a stable, which was designed to make him look good.

        Reigns needed an extra year of build, then it’d be perfect, and they could make him better as the champ. Meanwhile Bryan beats Lesnar and feuds with Rollins and whomever. Though even then turning Cena against Bryan at Mania 32 would’ve been smarter. Bryan would’ve been the top face, Cena could be the NWO Hogan heel, still drawing, headlining, and taking on the top face, Reigns gets more experience and becomes a mainstay, Bryan beats Cena, and Reigns and Bryan feud.

        So many better booking options and better ways to go about their future than WWE has done. But these are the same people that in 2015 are booking half of their future stars as jobbers and having Big Show and Kane as serious threats.

        It’s insanity.

        • Eric says:

          Dude, I’m not disagreeing with it being too soon for Reigns. I agree with you. I just don’t think you should make up your own facts to substantiate your claim. Reigns has been on the main roster longer than Goldberg when he won the title and he had more time in developmental than Goldberg did at the power plant. Your opinion is fine, your factual basis behind it should be more accurate.

        • F5 says:

          I’m not making anything up. Goldberg is a very different case than Reigns. People BOUGHT Goldberg. Goldberg was a professional athlete and an NFL Football Player. He was far more legit even in his first match than Reigns. And then Goldberg had the look, he had the intensity, he had FAR better moves and was MUCH stronger than Reigns, and his spear could legitimately destroy someone, and even then he used it only to set up his actual finisher, which he could hit anyone with because of his freakish strength, which allowed him to do it to the Big Show!

          Goldberg was FAR more established as a dominant force and a single’s star than Reigns when he faced Hogan for the title and won it. He was also the US Champion, which he steamrolled through the previous champion, Raven, to get, whom was established himself.

          Reigns hasn’t been a single’s wrestler anywhere NEAR the length of Goldberg in a real, televised company. And he isn’t half the star Goldberg was then, or arguably when he debuted. So, no, your argument is in zero way apt.

        • Eric says:

          Again, I’m not arguing that point. You’re just ranting and raving about whatever comes to mind. I merely called out a simple error you made which was that Reigns had less ring time than Goldberg. That’s still not accurate no matter what you say. I’m not disagreeing that Reigns isn’t ready or anything like that, but I’m also not making up my own facts as I go along. I’d argue that he isn’t ready based on having like two major matches as a singles guy at this point in his career, not based on saying he’s had less ring time than Goldberg which is so inaccurate it’s scary. You’re actually arguing against yourself here as I agree with you but you can’t get out of your own way and understand that even though you make decent points, people aren’t going to listen because you cloud them with nonsense and falsities. Keep it concise and accurate and you’re on to something.

          Of course, you’re also wrong in this last post as Reigns was a professional football player as well. It’s this type of stuff where you lose credibility.

  12. Steve says:

    For the first time ever; I disagree with your rating. The PPV overall felt more like a C- or a D+ to me, but that’s just my opinion.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I totally get that on a show like this. THe wrestling carried a lot of it, but it’s one of the most skippable pay per views I’ve ever seen. That can easily drag a show down and I think it did so here.

  13. Rainbow says:

    This one is certain: Maffew will have a blast doing the next Botchamania with this PPV.

  14. deanerandterry says:

    I love Bryan but I’m happy Reigns finally has a big win before he goes against Lesnar. I was really hoping WWE wasn’t going the Bryan route again and I’m happy they didn’t.

  15. Aeon Mathix says:

    People are really overlooking how fantastic Rusev looked. I thought he was another flash in the pan foreign heel who would end up as a rosebud by summer but man that was quite a performance. He hadnt had a long match until tonight and he delivered

  16. SamualDude says:

    So where does Bryan go to from here?

    Also I fear that if Roman doesn’t deliver at Mania, then he’ll be set back a LONG way

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I hope he doesn’t win the title.

      Alas, it seems Sheamus may be in play.

      • SamualDude says:

        I for the love of god, Hope we don’t get another Sheamus vs Bryan match.

        If Roman doesn’t deliver, WWE will mostly not look at it as a “we screwed up” situation but as a “roman screwed up” situation.

      • Gunther_224 says:

        Why not? WWE has been hard to watch with a part time champion and with. It looking like Lesnar will re-sign it doesn’t look like there is an end in sight. Reigns isn’t great but I’d take him over a champion who shows up 3-4 times a year.

    • Steve says:

      Honestly, even if he doesn’t deliver they’re just gonna let him keep the torch ‘cos he’s practically been handed it on a silver platter.

      • SamualDude says:

        It also depends on the crowd reaction over the next few weeks, If the fans start cheering Lesnar and booing Reigns then that will be interesting.

Leave a Reply to Steve Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.