Monday Night Raw – February 23, 2015: Saying The Same Things In Different Voices

You may also like...

22 Responses

  1. Jay H (the real one) says:

    I like how the WWE HOF is suppose to some sacred thing all of sudden based on who goes in and what they did. Its not just about what guys did just in WWE anymore as it covers there entire Careers.

    Also just do me a favor please. Just stop watching already. I seem to remember you saying you weren’t going to watch after January 5th. What happened to that? #jamesgracieisahypocrite

    • james gracie says:

      I know I said that but I decided to stay here and comment to educate people like you who know nothing about wrestling. You should be thanking me. By the summer you will know more about wrestling thanks to me.

  2. M.R. says:

    Is it weird that I’m finding Orton entertaining? I feel like that might be weird.

  3. Brian says:

    Barrett also lost clean to Sin Cara in early-January. Also, the announcers were saying Ascension was undefeated but they just lost last week on SmackDown! to Reigns and Bryan.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      True but that loss was by DQ. They’ve always considered pins/submissions as different kinds of falls. Just look at Rusev.

  4. ted says:

    Why in the hell are the bushwhackers going in the hall fame?

  5. J says:

    KB – you have seen it all. What am I missing about Reigns?

    I like the guy. I think he’s cool. Nothing screams mega-star about this guy at all. it’s so forced and the promos trying to pump him up make it worse. His in-ring is good, not anything mind blowing. His mic work is average. It’s not like he’s slinging catch phrases or has epic charisma that people are just going nuts for. Why does everyone keep saying he’s the next Rock, Austin, Hogan, etc. I see a healthy career of in/out of the main event because Vince loves him w/ his best work against former Shield members headlining PPVs. Not single-handedly selling PPVs/merch/tickets/etc.

    I’m not a hater by any means. I just can’t figure out how anyone immediately sees this guy as the next franchise player. I’ll take your word as you’ve watched enough wrestling to just know when ia guy is “it”

    • Thomas Hall says:

      I’m sorry if this is a disappointment but I don’t see it either.

      When you look back at all the other guys, they’ve had either a big boom or a lot of seasoning to get where they are so that the big title win is covering everything we already know. With Reigns, it’s like the title win is supposed to make people care about him. There’s a lot of potential there but since he’s been designated as the guy for almost a year now, there’s almost no way he can live up to the expectations.

      It’s like when you’re told something is the most awesome thing ever. When you hear that, it doesn’t matter what you think of it. That expectation means it’s almost impossible to be blown away and it’s unfair to whatever you’re looking at. When I watched Breaking Bad, I thought it was fine but I kept asking “this is it? This is the most amazing series in the history of TV that people rave about?” It’s the same issue for Reigns: if he has those expectations placed on him, he can have the best spear ever and it’s not going to matter.

      So yeah, it comes down to he’s the guy because WWE says he’s the guy because they decided he was over a year ago. They’ll make it fit as they go.

      • J says:

        Well thank God. I thought I was going nuts.

        Sadly people aren’t dumb. They need to connect to a guy to believe it.
        – HBK was really that arrogant + the best in ring performer
        – Lesnar is as real as it gets… you don’t know if it’s real/fake
        – Austin was real, too, with his pissed off attitude
        – The Rock has more charisma than any human being
        – Punk was a real life character
        – Daniel Bryan’s passion for wrestling connects to the fans

        Every person who sells out arenas sells them out for a reason. They don’t just get dubbed the next big thing. They are it. Even Cena can produce freakish strength, in-ring talent, solid promo work, and has an amazing look.

        Reigns – I mean I can’t name you 1 thing that he is even in the top 5 of the CURRENT WWE roster. I thought I was going mad. Love the reviews. I always read ’em. Thank you, KB!

      • ted says:

        “So yeah, it comes down to he’s the guy because WWE says he’s the guy because they decided he was over a year ago. They’ll make it fit as they go.”

        They are doing a terrible job of it thus far. I wonder how long until they admit it’s not working.

  6. Steve says:

    Is it just me or has every odd numbered Wrestlemania since 25 been below average, especially the main events.

    If this one continues the trend its officially an odd numbered Wrestlemania curse.

  7. larisano says:

    C+ is indeed generous.
    It was a storytelling episode, too bad they sat on their heels when telling those stories. I can’t really say they moved forward too much tonight at all.

    Brock bizarrely didn’t show up for some reason. The promo segment with Bryan, Reigns and Heyman wasn’t bad, but I have to say, it needed Brock in there somewhere, even if not in that segment, at least, they had to come face-to-face at some point.

    Orton was made to do what he did 4 months ago before having his head double-curb stomped by Rollins, meaning none of tonight’s shit was required whatsover.
    Story seems so easy to tell in ‘only’ 5 weeks of 5 hr TV, lMO.
    Sting takes out HHH, whilst the Viper, Randy Orton takes out the rest of the Authority in his quest to get Rollins 1-on-1. How hard is that? No need for tonight’s BS, lMO.

    Oh, and I’m guessing Sheamus-Bryan is almost a lock?

  8. Jay H (the real one) says:

    Actually they’ve been using the intros again for the Shows since the beginning of the year.

    RAW was ok tonight. I did like the Reigns/Bryan/Heyman Promo and the Main Event was fine,a tease of a 4-way IC Title feud for Mania,the Cena/Rusev stuff,and Orton’s stuff.

  9. Nathan says:

    Kidd was tagged!!! Cesaro tagged him before he went for the Superplex. How did everyone miss that?

  10. Bernkastel says:

    If Brock Lesnar does win at Mania I will be amazed. It might actually be a step in booking him in the direction he should have been from the start. Though I don’t think I could take the constant absences.

    great review as always.

  11. John says:

    C+ is really generous.

Leave a Reply to Steven Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.