Monday Night Raw – February 22, 2016: Here Comes The Wrestlemania Build

You may also like...

36 Responses

  1. Naitch1979 says:

    Aren’t these more of a recap than reviews? Aside from the ratings of the matches there seems to be very little analysis or any thoughts given. I enjoy reading your opinion pieces but these reviews seem to just be a recap of what I’ve just watched, which is one of the main criticisms of RAW!

    Don’t mean to slag the work off but I’d enjoy more ‘critique’, positive or negative than just a repetition of the events.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      There really isn’t much else I can do besides talk about what’s going on. Most of these are for the sake of faster recaps than a full on critique.

  2. Dragon says:

    I know a lot of 50 yr olds that can kick a 30 yr old’s ass

  3. the fanatic says:

    Haha james gracie – you forgot to comment this week! You lose.

  4. IC says:

    Speaking of accomplishments, maybe the Usos’ daddy (Rikishi) should have spent more time around them instead of going all over the place.

    They actually said maybe he should have spent less time buying thongs, so that was the insult part there.

    Also in the main event, Reigns speared Sheamus on the floor, so that’s the old “guy gets finisher on floor” standby to explain his disappearance.

  5. Greg says:

    I hate Shane vs Taker. I also love it. It’s like that Sting vs HHH match. Throw logic out the window and it’s awesome. Think about it for 2 seconds and it completely falls apart.

    At least we get to see Shane do a ridiculous jump.

    The reaction to Roman is going to be fun. He might drown in boos.

  6. ted says:

    Here’s a question. Putting aside the fact that the audience was cheering with glee that the top babyface was being punked AGAIN. Why was it booked like Reigns was simply outclassed and a putz? If you were going to say he was beat up from the night before? why wouldn’t you stress that on commentary? It just makes Reigns look outmatched to a guy he easily destroyed not even a month ago.

    • Jerichoholic94 says:

      All we can do is wait and see what their excuse is. The only reasonable match thus far is the Lesnar-Ambrose match but still it isn’t enough for a Wrestlemania. Injuries or not there’s better options they could’ve went with

      • IC says:

        I don’t even think that is a reasonable match because there is no reason to buy Ambrose as a threat to beat Lesnar based on the booking.
        I hate to say it, but Reigns would be a better opponent just because he’s been booked way better against Brock than his buddy has.

    • Greg says:

      Well Reigns was also just in a match. Not from last night but from the last 10 minutes before HHH came out.

      • ted says:

        That renders him virtually helpless? It’s not like Triple H blindsided him. Reigns say him coming and got beat down. Also didn’t Reigns annihilate Triple H after just having a match?

        • Greg says:

          Didn’t Roman have a chair during that? Also HHH was prepared this time.

        • ted says:

          I don’t believe he did have a chair. It’s a really poor story to tell. Reigns got destroyed by a guy at least 12 years older. While the audience cheered his death. Despite the fact that the biggest heel on the roster was the one doing the beating. Never mind he destroyed H with no issue a month before. Both times were not surprise attacks. You can’t even say he gets booed every so often. It’s almost every week at this point. Why do they treat Reigns like a chump and then act surprised when he isn’t over?

        • Greg says:

          I went back and looked, he had a chair. The age thing doesn’t really matter in wrestling. Most people won’t think wow Roman got beat up by a grandpa. Detroit was a heel crowd. I get what you mean though. Roman still gets cheered but it is getting less frequent.

          Honestly, this is the one time I’d accept a squash for the title. Give Roman a 4 month reign and then keep him away from the title (if they stick with face Roman). You just can’t have Roman lose the title so quickly again. Maybe even do a turn where HHH proclaims Roman proved he is the future by beating him, setting up Rollins vs Reigns eventually.

          I think current face Roman is still salvageable but I have no confidence that WWE can figure it out. They have to do a heel turn and try again down the line.

  7. chad says:

    I hope Shane is back with some sort of real life authority because the WWE really need a fish pair of eyes manning the ship. Shane is the one who went off and actually made something of himself in the business world so I hope he comes back in a top position in the company

  8. SamualDude says:

    So I’m not convinced that Shane will be the one to face Taker. I think they may change it up but not sure.

  9. Jay H (the real one) says:

    What a bonkers episode this was but in a good way. I did not even imagine Shane Mcmahon returning but that was a great surprise. That’s going to be interesting to see how he and Taker pull it off at WM 32.

    • ted says:

      Why the hell is the undertaker Vince’s heavy? Is taker a heel now? It makes no sense.

      • Jerichoholic94 says:

        Taker is my favorite and I like Shane but the only way is to bring back the Corporate Ministry or else how else would this make sense? Of course the Authority is disassembled more or less so I just don’t get it.. Why the cell? Where’s the connection? I don’t know what the hell these guys are thinking anymore

      • Wim says:

        Except that he isn’t, is he? Has Undertaker responded yet? This match is never going to happen.

  10. M.R. says:

    Is it that big a deal if Roman gets booed out of the building at Mania? It happened to Cena at WrestleMania 22 against the same guy and his career’s turned out ok.

    Bizarre choice for what I originally thought would be Taker’s last match, though. Even if Shane won’t win my guess is it’ll still be entertaining as hell.

    • ted says:

      It’s incredibly stupid and petty on the company’s part. If you don’t mind having your intelligence insulted. Than no it’s not so bad.

      • M.R. says:

        To mention the word ‘intelligence’ and to then proceed to use the wrong form of ‘Then’…..

        • ted says:

          Which makes the other points less valid somehow right? Good try though. If you don’t have a counter argument and think spelling mistakes makes you superior. Next time you might consider staying out of it.

        • ted says:

          What i’m saying is I could explain to you why having entire arenas constantly booing the so called “hero” of the story is a bad thing. Or why ignoring the fan base is extraordinarily arrogant and stupid. But I won’t. Why? because your not going to listen anyway. So I’ll say good day to you.

        • M.R. says:

          So the current top babyface of the company shouldn’t be getting booed? Oh, thanks. Good thing you’re here.

  11. ted says:

    They really don’t care do they? They really are this tone deaf. This determined to tell their story, their way. Common sense and fan enjoyment be damned.

  12. M says:

    All things considered, I honestly think Shane at this point will be the better worker in the match against Undertaker. If he’s ANYTHING like the suicidal Shane McCrazypants of the past then it’ll be a ride and a half. Can’t say much about Undertaker, but from the last few years I’ve only seen sad stuff, if he can actually lift Shane then he might be able to pull off one last tombstone, but he looks like he’d barely be able to weakily choke push Shane off the top.

  13. Your Eternal Reward says:

    and you know what Vince its only going to get worse. No matter what dastardly thing Triple H were to do to Roman over the next six weeks people are going to cheer him for it because after a year of people clearly showing that they don’t want Roman you still insist on Roman.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.