Extreme Rules 2016: Extreme Kickouts And Cleaning Supplies

You may also like...

47 Responses

  1. Bloodbuzz Bunk says:

    I never said the man was a good babyface he is as naturally suited as a monster/enforcer/heater type if I have ever seen one. That’s why when he is just screaming, grunting, and destroying things he gets popular. He did that in the Shield and it occasionally takes hold when he isn’t hogging all the WWE Title oxygen and pretending to be an underdog. He was born on third base but comes off like he thinks he hit a 2 out walk off homerun. Which is why its cool that they are playing with this heel turn. However, fair is fair and AJ kicked out of as much if not more rough looking stuff and Reigns hit a desperation spear from his knees essentially. I’m going to get as worked up about it as apparently 90% of the internet did and let it ruin a GREAT MATCH.

    Post Mania I put the over the under of great World Title feuds/matches in Reign’s likely 9-12 month reign at 1. I have been pleasantly surprised at how his reign has exceeded my expectations at this point.

  2. Dragon says:

    I thought it was a good PPV….and for the people still bitching about the Reigns push, quit watching if you don’t like it…..I don’t like it much but I can accept it just like every other show I watch where I don’t like a plot element, I may not like it but I will keep watching. Back in the 80’s I hated the Hogan push but I accepted it and kept watching. In the end it is their show to run and they are not losing THAT much to warrant a referendum on the issue.

    • Dragon says:

      and btw I am in no way comparing Hogan to Reigns

      • Thomas Hall says:

        That helps a bit.

        The difference is Hogan came with mainstream acceptance and INSANE upside (the NBC deal that continues to this day can heavily be attributed to him), plus an entirely new generation and style of wrestling.

        Reigns is just a guy. That’s the the thing: there’s really nothing special about him or anything that stands out. He’s gotten MUCH better on the mic and can more than hold his own in the ring, but I have no reason to care about him. Someone like Hogan was so different from anyone else that you had to notice. Reigns is just a big power guy and that’s been done many times before.

        There’s definitely something to Reigns and anyone who thinks he doesn’t have a place in WWE is crazy. However, he isn’t working as the mega face of the company.

    • Ted says:

      Lol or I could keep pointing out what I don’t like about reigns while enjoying other aspects of the show.

      Also they are losing money and ratings. Not entirely reigns fault. But he isn’t the answer either.

      • Dragon says:

        I agree with u Ted….he doesn’t seem to be THE guy…….but he is getting a huge reaction….not a face reaction, but a huge one nonetheless, as long as he gets a response of any kind the E will continue on with him. Until Rollins dethrones him of course.

  3. Bloodbuzz Bunk says:

    Now to the Main Event. The first one was an A and that felt like an A to me too. I understand the essence of the collective complaints about devaluing the Styles Clash but honestly it is a move WWE never really cared to promote. They like the Phenomenal Forearm and Calf Crusher better for obvious safety reasons and the fact that AJ is shorter than half the roster so it makes the Clash look a little forced.

    But let’s look objectively at the big spots each guy took and kicked out of. Aj takes an insane back body drop through an announce table( the air he got was abnormal) and a sweet Splash Mountain Bomb from Reigns and kicks out. AJ then proceeds to take( in the highlight of match spot wise) a swing into the apron, swing into a barricade, and launched powerbomb through an announce table, a dangerous superman punch spot on the top rope mid springboard, and a launched spear over the steps on the floor.

    So basically AJ was getting crushed with some of the most awesome tough spots I have seen on the main roster in the last few years in a non Lesnar match. The Club enters and Reigns who has taken a few kicks and suplex into the turnbuckle basically kicks out of a Boot of Doom which a signature move of the Club not a finisher( bear with me). AJ takes 4 superkicks and a frog splash and kicks out. Then the two style clash kick outs and AJ is finally put down on a great Spear off a springboard. I’m sorry AJ took 80% of the bumps and it made sense that he lost. It wasn’t like “Roman overcomes the odds” as much as Roman dominated and when all hell broke loose AJ almost got him. Add on the awesome moment where AJ finally snaps and hits the Usos and Reigns with a chair 4 times each in like 15 seconds and the frenzy the crowd was in and this is an A if not a MOTY candidate.

    • Ted says:

      Reigns gets to spear someone seconds after taking crushing chairs shots. It seemed out of place and ruined the flow to me.

    • Ted says:

      Also how many arenas does reings have to be booed out of until the smark argument doesn’t hold water anymore?

  4. Bloodbuzz Bunk says:

    I agree with everything you said except for the Asylum match and the main event.

    Firstly bless all four IC title participants for basically deeming to make that belt mean something again without the cheap tricks of having a main event star give it some juice and abandon it. Rusev also needs to be seriously pushed with US title instead of feed to Cena but I’m not optimistic in that regard.

    Poor Vaudvillians, Get better Enzo so you and Cass can solidify the tag team division.

    Now to in regards to the Asylum, I agree with Marky-Marc about it’s position on the card and the inherent sobering effects of what was essentially 10 Hanging Chekov’s guns. But it was about 5-8 minutes to long and if they just would have let them bleed it would have appeased the smarky crowd in NJ. But my argument here is that it can be a match with serious violence and comedic elements. It’s funny to hear Jericho complain about the mop or the whole Ambrose is secretly proficient with nunchucks without diminishing the fact that they hate each other for other reason that each of them keeps escalating a silly reason to feud because they are both proud and crazy. I would give it a B.

  5. Big Ell says:

    Fun recap of a show I was glad to be in attendance for.

    Small note. Crowd was saying “We Want Rollins” during the Asylum match, not Ryder. Did you hear a “Fight Forever” chant akin to NXT Takeover? I sure didn’t in the live crowd. I’ll probably be watching that 4 Way again though anyway so I’ll listen for it!

  6. Thomas Hall says:

    Here’s the thing: you can’t listen to your audience all the time. Now yes, there are certainly instances like Daniel Bryan and CM Punk where you have to push people at certain times and it makes sense. However, listening to the crowd universally isn’t the best idea in the world, because the audience in the arena is a lot smaller than the audience around the world.

    In Reigns’ case though, I’m really not sure what they’re going with here. Reigns as the top face clearly isn’t working at this point, but at least the tweener push has started. There’s definitely a lot of talent there but there are still some major changes that need to take place.

  7. Thomas Hall says:

    I’m thinking I need to do some more talking on this Reigns thing but the post match stuff was……odd.

    On one hand, yeah Rollins returned as a heel in WWE’s eyes. I don’t think that’s really up for debate.

    On the other hand, he’s at least a borderline face in the fans’ eyes because the fans don’t want to cheer Reigns right now.

    A lot of it is going to be determined by his promo tomorrow.

  8. Marky-Marc says:

    The Asylum match was doomed from the beginning for a few reasons. First, it went immediately after the awesome IC Title match. Very tough to follow. Second, I think the crowd knew the ending wasn’t coming until all or most of the hanging weapons were used. It’s like what Foley said about his Cell match with HHH: when the crowd knows it’s not the end of the match they’re not going to get too excited. Once the tacks came out you knew we were close.

    I enjoyed the main event, overbooking aside. Some of the spots were impressive and I think it came out better than I was expecting.

    Good call on the Miz retain. His reign has been short but I think it’s been built up to the point where a loss is going to mean a good rub for someone else.

    New Day gets seven minutes? Really?

    If Rollins is cleared from ACL/MCL surgery in just six months, he might be more of a freak than Cena.

    • Greg says:

      6 months is actually when you are cleared after ACL surgery (takes 6 months for the ACL to reattach). Usually people will take 7-12 months to get their strength back. Pro athletes like Rollins will usually do a different more intensive rehab so they can come back at 6 months. No reason for a normal person to do the intensive version hence the longer recovery time.

  9. Aeon Mathix says:

    I’m not sure why but I seem to have lost all interest in Dean Ambrose. How much did that Lesnar squash damage Dean KB?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      A lot. This Jericho feud has helped but a win over Jericho is almost like a participation badge. At some point, Dean needs to win something of value and a cage match against Jericho isn’t it.

      • larisano says:

        Why did the Ambrose-Y2J feud fall so flat? It wasn’t the worst ever but it can’t be denied that it was still terrible overall.

        Really letdown since it was the kind of feud I expected to be top notch when it was teased around NoC last yr.

  10. Your Eternal Reward says:

    That is what i hate about Roman’s booking, don’t have him take several finishers in a row, stand up and hit a spear for the easy pin fall.

    It just makes everyone but Roman look like shit. Instead of a spear why not having the spear lead into a strong power move like a powerbomb or some kind of high impact suplex. The spear should not be ending matches.

  11. Jay H (the real one) says:

    Is the Styles Clash really that impressive when you look at the move? Sure it’s cool he’s still able to use it when we should be glad he is but I like the Forearm being used more as AJ’s finisher. It’s a better visual when he’s flying through the air IMO.

    Overall a very good PPV with a strong Main Event (though I guess im not surprised people chant you still suck at Reigns even when he’s breaking out new stuff he doesn’t normally do but such is life with 2016 Wrestling Fans). Glad that Seth Rollins is back and that 4 Way for the IC Title is easily a MOTY Candidate right now.

    • ted says:

      It’s because he’s boring and his character is not working and the company is not addressing it. Fans don’t like being insulted. Imagine that.

      • Jay H (the real one) says:

        I think that they have addressed it and I don’t think it matters what reaction he gets at this point because he’s going to be the man. Imagine that.

        • ted says:

          Ah and how did they address it?

          It does matter because it’s going to lead to problems in fact it already has. It make the company look tone deaf and out of touch. Ratings are down, revenue is down. Now this isn’t entirely Roman’s fault. But he’s not helping. The guy is not working in the role he’s in. If the company could just accept that and try something else it would be fine.

          Roman will never be the guy they want in the role he’s in. I don’t care how many people he beats, I don’t care how many title runs he gets, I don’t care how many smug promos he shoots. he’s not going to be the next john cena level star.

        • ted says:

          Why would you fight your audience? No other company does this.

          The wwe says Roman Reigns is a star the guy the show should be based around. Fans all over the world say no he isn’t. We don’t like him we want insert other wrestler name in his place. They say that’s nice continue roman push.

          It makes no sense. Push guys the audience likes as faces. Push guys the audience dislikes as heels. This isn’t hard. People are leaving the audiences are getting smaller. They feel like nothing they do will matter. So why watch?

        • Jay H (the real one) says:

          Yeah because listening to Fans all the time will get you so far. There are a few exceptions but not everyone wants the same thing all the time. The audiences are getting smaller? They had another sellout last night. Not sure what you’re looking at.

          Also if you are that unhappy then turn it off.

        • Ted says:

          I can link you if you like to the gates shrinking over the last 4 years. female demographic is holding males over 25 is shrinking. No the company is not making as much over the last five years. You think Vince sold stock because business is good? Don’t be naive.

          Also using your own logic. You don’t like what I’m writing don’t read it.

          I however will watch for the parts I do like and point out the flaws in the parts I don’t. I don’t know where you got miserable. I don’t like the reigns character and it does annoy me. But I’d hardly say it makes me miserable.

          If every arena they go to boos reigns to where they have to mute the mice. You have failed to make a baby face.

    • BSE says:

      Roman Reigns doesn’t have a character. His mic skills suck. That’s why people don’t like him.

      • Greg says:

        Couldn’t the same be said for Styles?

      • Ted says:

        No because he’s being cheered. He’s getting the reaction he’s supposed to. Also reigns and styles are equal on the mic

        • Greg says:

          That was my point. They are both the same on the mic. They are both capable in ring (Styles is better but Reigns is growing).

          I’m not the biggest fan of either guy (I favor entertainment over in-ring ability). They both have the same weaknesses yet one is hated and the other is loved.

        • Greg says:

          I also want to address WWE’s business being bad.

          Let’s take 2011-2015 and compare it to the Attitude Era years (97-98 through 01-02, WWE use to start their statement years a few months into the year hence 97-98 being a starting point). WWE’s revenue has been higher each year from 11-15 than during the AE. The higest revenue made during the AE was $456 million while the lowest made since 2011 was $481 million. 2015’s revenue was the highest in their history ($658 million). The AE obliterates the past few years in regard to income ($189 million AE vs $27 million 11-15). The big reason for that is the Network (the costs for that started in 2011). The startup costs for that were enormous along with taking awhile to hit their break even subscriber point. The movie division probably also hurt them as well but I don’t feel like looking into that (there was a $23 million loss in their movie divison in 2011).

          WWE is actually doing better than ever in revenue but their costs are also high. Looking at it in black and white would suggest the AE did way better. But that isn’t the case. WWE also didn’t have to battle things like piracy, streaming, 5 billion other TV channels as much as they do now. Combine that with the Network and that gives a pretty good explanation for their drop in income. The product not being the best doesn’t help but there are more factors than just the product.

        • Greg says:

          Oops, I meant the income was $189 million AE vs $51 million 11-15.

  12. ted says:

    The show was meh. The 4 way intercontinental title match was awesome.

    The main event was good. Roman still sucks. Was Seth’s return supposed to be a heel turn? A face turn?

    • Greg says:

      I’m guessing he is a heel. A face wouldn’t have attacked him like that. Similar thing happened with Ryback/Cena when Ryback turned.

      • ted says:

        Thing is that isn’t how it came off. As far as most people are concerned. Seth just knocked out the heel everyone can’t stand.

        • Marky-Marc says:

          @Ted

          Reigns is a face. The person who sneak-attacks him from behind after a match is a heel. Regardless of who the fans are cheering for, that is how it goes.

        • ted says:

          2 problems with that

          1. it’s not even true. The audience dicates who is a face and who is a heel. if it doesn’t work you change it

          2. He doesn’t wrestle like a face and doesn’t even identify as such himself. He is being presented like a heel. If he is supposed to be a face he’s garbage at it.

        • ted says:

          “dictates”

  13. Scott says:

    You contradicting yourself is one of the only entertaining things left about your reviews. This is from your Mania 32 review: ROAR! THEY TOTALLY KILLED THE STYLES CLASH!!! EVERY TIME SOMEONE KICKS OUT OF A FINISHER IT CAN NEVER BE USED AGAIN!!! ROAR I SAY! Typical response I’ve seen to that near fall and as usual, wrestling fans need to calm down because it means nothing.

    Have a good day.

    • Thadzo says:

      I’d assumed they killed the move early because it’s so unsafe, and Jericho was the guy to kill it because he’s enough of a veteran not to get hurt by it. I’m more surprised that it was even performed than that it didn’t get the pin.

    • Greg says:

      They can always build a move back up but they did it hurt for the short term. Long term, it will be fine. Kicking out of it on a chair is a tad ridiculous.

      JR has said in the past that kicking out of too many things is akin to cheating. Way too many things were kicked out of in the match (not just the Clash).

      If the move was unsafe, they wouldn’t do it in the first place. AJ has said he is fine without it. It honestly doesn’t even look that good anyways.

    • larisano says:

      Totally agreed on that. The guy who kicked out of it tonight is the current Top guy in the WWE. Don’t see the big issue in him kicking out the Styles Clash at all.

      • Greg says:

        It was more he kicked out after 2 Clashes, chair shots and whatever Gallows/Carl’s finisher is. That is a lot to kick out of.

        Take The Shield. They rarely lost in 6 man tag matches. No matter who they faced. They wouldn’t have been nearly as good if they lost a bunch of times. Apply that to a finisher. If a finish always ends a match then every time it is hit, you’ll go oh crap it’s over. When a finish is kicked out of like this you’ll go eh until it is built back up.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          This. One Clash would have been fine if not expected. It’s three finishers, one of which on a chair, after twenty minutes of hard brawling.

      • ted says:

        Even if he is the top guy so what? It doesn’t do a.j. any favors. Roman is going to be protected anyhow so why do it? Why not save it for someone who does need a rub that way?

        Also don’t kid yourself Roman is not going to be the top guy the way Austin Hogan or even Cena was. I’d be surprised if this experiment lasts the year.

        If the ratings continue to go down and they continue to lose money. They are going to have to make a change.

  14. Thadzo says:

    You seem quite unimpressed with the thumbtacks, but isn’t that kind of a big deal for the current WWE era? My brother (who just started watching WWE with this year’s Wrestlemania) really despises Dean Ambrose, but still liked the match because of the thumbtack spots.

    Though maybe that’s on me, for overselling the “WWE hates blood now and those thumbtacks are obviously just a tease” angle…

Leave a Reply to ted Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.