Monday Nitro – March 26, 2001 (2016 Redo, Final Episode, Final Thoughts On Nitro): Everybody Have Fun Tonight

You may also like...

10 Responses

  1. 0mega140 says:

    Finally. I’m tired of how people overrate Nitro.

    WCW was good for a while but it wasn’t the end of wrestling because WCW died. In fact, Ted Turner’s company had many problems and cancer that continue to this day.
    it had a positive legacy but in retrospect they were more negative than positive.

  2. RJAY63 says:

    I think the state of WCW in those final years was the main reason the subsequent “Invasion” angle failed. While Vince certainly made mistakes, the WCW brand had become so toxic that no WWE/WWF fan wanted anything to do with it. I remember the first few WCW matches on WWF television out of the building, especially the abomination that was Booker T vs Buff Bagwell. They then had to combine it with ECW to make it seem any sort of threat! As a magazine wrote back in the day “the Invasion angle only created one new star in the form of RVD, and it’s safe to say his flashy ring style would have got him over anyway”.

    One thing I will ask KB, how would you have played the Invasion angle?

    Having said that, I still missed WCW not for the content, but for the fact it reminded me of a happy time in my life. We had “WCW Worldwide” in the UK on Channel 5 and I had fond memories watching it through a fuzzy screen because there was such poor analogue reception in my flat. Because the storylines made no sense and everything was a mess, it actually stimulated my imagination as it was so easy to think of ways to make the program better.

    • RJAY63 says:

      Sorry, the third sentence should have read “I remember the first few WCW matches on WWF television being booed out of the building, especially the abomination that was Booker T vs Buff Bagwell”.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Wait A LONG time before trying it. Like at least a year if not more. As you said, WCW’s name was toxic and there was no point in seeing who was better as they just did on the Monday Night Wars. Also they needed an end game instead of just trading titles with no rhyme or reason.

  3. Bloodbuzz Bunk says:

    So in this autopsy of Nitro where do you think the point of no return is and what does WCW do differently to change the tide. If they end the NWO storyline gracefully with Sting in 97, transition to 1.5-2 years of Goldberg dominance from mid 98-late 99, and hang on to Jericho/Radicalz and run a New Blood v Millionarie Club type story with them do you think they are surviving into the mid 00s?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Maybe but they would have been on borrowed time. With the creative control contracts, the people in charge and having no answer to Steve Austin (who was coming no matter what), there was almost no way to stop the WWF and that’s such a big hit.

      • Bloodbuzz Bunk says:

        Very true. I guess those are the right moves to make but it’s doesn’t treat the source of the problems in the mess that was creative( be it Russo’s booking or big star creative control stifling young talent). I just think if they could have hung on with Goldberg who as noted in this review was still a huge star in 2001 then the fall of Austin throughout 2001 and Rock’s sudden 2002 departure leaves WCW in the prime position to jump right back on top if they set their table right.

  4. MikeCheyne says:

    I watched the 2001 episodes last year…the obvious guess for the attacker of the Magnificent Seven was Sting, who was good at making mystery appearances, used a bat that could have knocked the guys out, and was about ready to make his return. Of course, that’s probably TOO obvious for WCW.

  5. BJ says:

    If Vince kept wwe and wcw separate do u think he coulda made them a success longterm KB?

Leave a Reply to 0mega140 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.