Royal Rumble 2017: I Can Go With That

You may also like...

39 Responses

  1. #MrScissorsKick says:

    KB you’re my dude but I think you made a mistake.

    “Pre-Show: Nikki Bella/Becky Lynch/Naomi vs. Becky Lynch/Mickie James/Natalya”

    Not trying to be picky here, but I don’t think Becky was on both teams here.

  2. Booker says:

    ‘At parts’ being the key there.

    Greg – No offence, but how long have you been watching professional wrestling? You always seem to come off as a bit of a newbie.

    • Greg says:

      No offense taken.

      I’m not a newbie though. Started somewhere in 1999. Not sure why I would come off as one though.

  3. Dmxfury says:

    Cena finally matched Flair? Gross

  4. Wim says:

    The thing about Reigns that disturbed me the most is that he’s not even supposed to be in the match. I had a shot at the Universal title earlier that match. Meaning he could have been the Universal champion AND win the royal rumble. I’m sure something like that has happened before but it simply doesn’t make any sense. The champs themselves should not be in the royal rumble match which gives them a shot at their own title.

    • Greg says:

      I believe this first happened the year Ziggler faced Edge for the world title (can’t remember which Rumble that was).

      The easy explanation is the guy who loses a title match gets the spot. AJ could logically decline because of his rematch clause. This allowed someone else to get AJ’s/Cena’s spot.

      • Wim says:

        Okay but that would mean nr 30 is a last minute decision (if Reigns won the match he would not have gotten the spot). But if Owens would have gotten the spot he had to decline because of his rematch clause. So they’d have to make a last second decision as to who gets the spot?

        I kinda get your point but it doesn’t add up to me.

        Even more dissappointing to me is that I actually expected Angle would enter the rumble. So I was really rooting for him to be nr 30 spot. Lol, but that’s just me off course.

  5. CrazySole says:

    I would’ve been okay with Reigns in the Rumble if Styles to got a second chance in the Rumble, but of course they just ruin everything.

    I was satisfied with Orton winning, him and Bray can be excellent. I’m more excited to see Bray Wyatt with the championship more than anything else assuming they go that way.

    Tye was a nice surprise, hopefully he joins Smackdown and flourishes.

    • Greg says:

      Styles lost his title while Roman did not. Styles has a rematch clause and doesn’t need the Rumble. Roman does not have a rematch clause so he had to win the Rumble.

      • NightShiftLoser says:

        But the announcers did a piss poor job of portraying that. There was no promo, no jumping someone for their spot, no barging into Steph’s office…The best plan, if this were anything other than Reigns being forced as a conquering hero, he’d have jumped Braun at #7, taken his spot, and lasted a long time in the match, with the commentators talking about how heroic he was and how brave he is for fighting still.

        It’s still shit, and still a ploy to cram Roman into every corner of broadcasting, but it at least is an attempt at something sensical.

        • Greg says:

          Someone really needs to direct them to talk about the stories. I don’t think they even mentioned Bray after Randy won. Simple things like this help so much and yet they don’t even attempt it. Mind boggling.

  6. M.R. says:

    Cena/Styles was good but nowhere near their classic at Summerslam, you went a little high on the rating.

    Does this mean Reigns/Taker and Goldberg/Lesnar at Mania? Because that’s pretty piss poor.

  7. Dorian says:

    Trolling is not always fun – case in point being our resident troll on these websites Jay H or that idiot who usually begins with “How bad was that…”

    • Greg says:

      Yes but why troll your own crowd with something that might piss them off? This isn’t like a heel winning. This is a feeling of dread and disappointment.

    • Jay H (the real one) says:

      In what way am I troll? Pretty sure im not the one coming on here claiming i don’t watch anymore yet bother to comment anyway. I at least try to have a decent conversation about what’s going on.

  8. Stephen says:

    I get the sense Regins was thrown in at 30 as a distraction. When Randy eliminates Roman, the crowd cheers because Roman doesn’t win, if he dumps Jericho or Taker last to win, then there’s a chance the crowd boos the even out of the building.

    I also don’t get the meltdown about Cena vs Randy, just because Cena has the title doesn’t mean he will have it at Mania. I think there’s a few ways they can go with this, the obvious one being Orton vs Wyatt, but I think the money match is Orton vs AJ which I think has potential to be a classic.

  9. chad says:

    for all those that undoubtedly lost their minds at Cena tying Flair, it docent really matter; Cents 16 WWE reigns don’t really mean as much as Flairs anyways. His were earned in a time when the title changes hands much more frequently and is much less prestigious than it was when Flair did most of his.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      That’s….maybe half true at best, unless Flair’s last two title reigns totaling less than eight days has some significant meaning that I’m not aware of. The three before that combine for about four months, putting his last five reigns at less than a month each.

      That’s also ignoring the lack of doing weekly national TV for so much of his career and having supercards every month with title defenses.

      • AJStyles@gmail.com says:

        I get you don’t like Ric Flair, KB (if that is your real name), but get real. Ric Flair won his titles across the NWA, WWF and WCW. He was a World Champion in the days when a promotion only had one World Champion. And, when he was the World Heavyweight Champion, he made everything about the World Heavyweight Championship, whereas John Cena was a superstar first and a champion second.

        • Greg says:

          I get you don’t like John Cena, AJStyles@gmail.com (if that is your real name, which would be very cruel) but get real. John Cena won his titles in the undisputed biggest company in the world in the days when they did not have Vince Russo as a booker. And, when he was/is the World Heavyweight Champion, he made/makes everything about how the champ is here, whereas Ric Flair was a male gigolo first and a champion second.

        • Thomas Hall says:

          Actually there was a double title at parts of Flair’s career. He won the WCW International Title twice, which was counted as a World Title at the same time the WCW World Title was around. The same is true of a few of his NWA World Title wins, which took place at the same time the WCW World Title was around.

  10. NightShiftLoser says:

    I wish they would have done more with the tumbler, considering the time they had. Also, where are the Rumble promos?? Bring back the ice cream bars, Vince!

  11. Jay H (the real one) says:

    Randy Orton winning was a surprise but im ok with it. and I agree i think Cena drops the WWE Title at the Elimination Chamber to Bray Wyatt to set up him & Orton at WM 33.

    I couldn’t help but laugh on the inside of imagining people just being pissed that Roman Reigns came out at 30 but what a troll job i will say. Looks like Taker/Reigns at Mania.

    A good Royal Rumble especially the undercard. John Cena/AJ Styles was really good once again.

  12. Aeon Mathix says:

    wasnt a fan of the rumble. the last 5 rumbles, 4 winners have been repeats and the other one was a guy no one on earth wanted to win. i just want someone interesting to win. maybe some find this wyatt orton thing interesting but i dont see the appeal of it. I cant even see it as the Main Event at Wrestlemania

  13. SamualDude says:

    I get the feeling they may go with Orton helping Wyatt win the title at Elimination Chamber only to turn after the match is over.

  14. NightShiftLoser says:

    I’m in agreement that Reigns at 30 killed the match. It was a major letdown, with everyone expecting/hoping for Joe, Bálor, or…anyone else. The crowd rightfully shit all over it, but that clearly means nothing to Vince. That might be as bad as Rey Mysterio coming out instead of Daniel Bryan. Loved the Cena/Styles match, so it balances out. Did not expect a Code Red from Cena.

    • Greg says:

      Make Lesnar, Goldberg or Taker as #30 and the crowd will be happy. They will know who is coming and it would be someone who they want to see. Reigns was a stupid decision.

    • Dorian says:

      Honestly, as pissed as i was with seeing reigns out – i did think Vince and co trolled us real well. Have Reigns at 30, have him super man punch a bunch of crowd favourites, have him eliminate taker, have him act like the big dawg…lol

      That all said, i popped like Steiner’s vein when orton rko’d him and then dumped him out. Fitting.

  15. abhilash ashok Mende says:

    I’ll always enjoy watching Goldberg squashing Lesnar just because of the facts that Lesnar hates other people in real life and Goldberg is a humble and good man. I loved how he bowed down to the audience after squashing Lesnar in SS last year.
    The WWE have made their most respected star (Taker), Lesnar’s bitch everytime thwy have faced off in the ring, so watching Lesnar becoming someone else’s bitch is just awesome, even better when the guy is Goldberg, who I rhink is a genuinely good man in real life.

    Also, it was downright embarrasing to see Taker in the ring in that awful shape.

  16. Greg says:

    I can’t believe they are passing Cena vs Taker. Reigns being #30 was a horrid decision. It wasn’t a fun swerve that he made it to the end. It was a holy crap you dumbasses. Sucked the fun out of the match. Bray will insert himself into Orton’s story. I doubt they will do Cena vs Orton again. Bray should have got that win.

    This match desperately needed some surprises and someone else at #30.

    Reigns is just not being accepted by the fans and they need to realize that.

  17. Your Eternal Reward says:

    I found it smart during the Lesnar/Goldberg/Taker sequence that most of the roster just chilled rather then feeding themselves to the part time monsters. Roman Reigns completely killed the ending for me however, just why? They could set up a match with Taker that no one wants to see elsewhere. Why did Roman get a spot in the rumble?

    I’m okay with Orton winning since we have the whole Wyatt Family friendship going on right now so things could change over the next two months (A random Cena/Harper vs Orton/Bray tag match could be weirdly entertaining). Though i would have preferred Jericho.

  18. Kaips says:

    KB-

    The only logical way to go on Raw is Owens vs. Jericho, right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.