Royal Rumble 2019: I Almost Had A Birthday Watching This Show

You may also like...

19 Responses

  1. Wim says:

    I think I’d rate those rumble matches the other way around. The women’s rumble was boring and dragged but I enjoyed the men’s rumble a lot and all the spots delivered.

    Not a popular opinion but I disliked both winners. They are both overrated and quite boring imo. But as they are definetely popular enough to main event mania, I can except it.

  2. Mike M. says:

    1. I’m ok with Miz/Shane winning the tag belts last night as it was a genuinely nice moment with Miz and his dad. That said, unless this leads to a face Miz/heel Bryan match at WM, I don’t care what happens with Miz and Shane.
    2. I’m totally fine with Asuka beating Becky clean, but Becky should have passed out instead of tapping out. It goes against her character.
    3. I was shocked by how dominant they let Sasha look. Rousey’s best match so far by a mile.
    4. The women’s RR was good. I would have liked to seen Nikki Cross last a little longer though.
    5. AJ/Bryan was boring. All this build up of McMahon wanting to bring out the “real AJ” and it doesn’t play into the match at all. That said, sign me up for Bryan having his own following.
    6. Balor/Lesnar was as good as it was gonna be. I can’t wait until Lesnar’s gone, but I’ll give him credit, he bumps his ass off for the smaller guys.
    7. The men’s RR was so meh. I’m ok with their being no big surprise entrant, but it was just so overwhelming. Hawkins, Titus, and Jose should have been replaced by NXT guys. And way to build Ali up to have him be destroyed by Nia Jax. Rollins was the right pick to win, but only because no other face has been built up. Honestly, my favorite part was imagining KB’s reaction when Dolph’s music hit.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      1. I’d bet on Miz vs. Shane before that, as face Miz vs. heel Bryan could be fascinating in multiple ways.

      2. That’s a good idea.

      3. Her best single match indeed.

      4. Agreed.

      5. See #4.

      6. He really does. I’ve always liked Brock’s selling.

      7. My wife was coming upstairs and I actually shouted DANG IT out loud. She thought I had broken something.

  3. Prophet says:

    In the world of WWE where it’s just constant heat I enjoyed that both rumble winners were fan favourites.

  4. Shane says:

    Rollins is just so uninteresting it’s going to be hard for me to get hyped for his Mania match against whoever it is.

  5. NightShiftLoser says:

    Smackdown is far better than Raw, and you basically proposed removing it from the show. The overall rating will be better when you redo this next year. The only things that were not needed were Rusev/Nakamura (which only furthered Becky, and could have happened last Tuesday) and the Raw tag match.

  6. Dragon says:

    1. I agree the show was too long.

    2. I agree with most of your review KB but I don’t understand how you think Shane winning is unrealistic but you praise NXT constantly but the constant kickouts on finishers and spots that should kill someone and the obvious looking choreography is just as unrealistic. Shane and Miz have been telling a good story and the shooting star looked great.

    3) Beck Lynch is over rated. I don’t like the fact that she won but I understand she is a popular pick with the IWC. I preferred last year’s rumble….they should have had at least 1 returning legend in there as there were to many names that casual fans don’t even know which makes viewing not as enjoyable.

    4) I loved the Brock/Finn match….again, good storytelling with the injury to Brock and shows that when he can’t hit the F5, he can still beat you other aways. Balor looked great in that loss.

    5) The men’s Rumble sucked. Rollins is a good but boring pick to win. Jeff Jarret was nice surprise. Kurt Angle was wasted. And the #30 spot has been done many times….just….a waste seems to be best way to describe this Rumble.

    Once again, good review KB….appreciate you still doing the review during your difficult time.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      2. The NXT wrestlers are 20-something wrestlers, not 49 year old businessmen who wrestled infrequently twenty or so years ago.

      3. A legend or two would have helped yes.

      4. He did, but I’m rather over Lesnar and have been for a year now. At least Balor did get in some offense though, true.

      5. I wouldn’t call it a waste. I’d call it proof of the need for character development on the main shows.

  7. Harry F says:

    I think when you redo this show next year, you’ll wonder what you were thinking about the women’s rumble. Tons of botches, terrible pacing, endless no-names…thank god for the last five minutes or it would have been diabolical.

  8. Hamler says:

    I think the Nia spot was the best spot in the mens rumble match. Seeing Nia getting her ass kicked was worth the half a day I spent watching this ppv.

  9. Aeon Mathix says:

    Styles’ matches have become a chore for the most part. It might just be his feuds going much longer than they need to. Yeah him vs Nakamura, Joe, Bryan are all awesome on paper and when you see it once but like 4 or 5 times in a row because WWE thinks the only way to keep a feud going is by making them face each other 100 times is tiring.

    • BestSportsEntertainer says:

      Agreed.

      Styles wrestled Nakamura 5 times in 3 months, Joe 4 times in 2 1/2 months, and Bryan 4 times in 3 months. At some point, fans just stop caring as much.

      WWE really needs to learn how to build a story instead of just having nonstop matches.

  10. noahconstrictor says:

    Normally, I agree with you, but I think you’re pretty off on this one. The Smackdown Tag Title match was honestly pretty good, even if it is Shane winning the titles, and the only really bad match on the main card was the Smackdown Men’s title match. I know for the sake of the reviews you usually watch the undercard, but I’ve honestly found that cutting the undercard pre-show show stuff fixes a lot of issues. I was kind of tired around the Smackdown title match, but the Lesnar match got me back into it, and the men’s Rumble was much better than a D. Had a lot of good action, and even though there wasn’t a big surprise name, I thought the Nia spot was absolutely perfect for what it was, and that the winner was the right choice. I probably would put the Men’s Rumble at something closer to a B-, and the whole show overall at about a B. The women’s Rumble was one of the best Rumble matches in a long time, and minus the Smackdown tag match which was perfectly watchable and the Smackdown title match which was decent but too long, the show was genuinely enjoyable, and I think the rating being that low just because it went to long isn’t doing justice to how solid of an opening they had.

    • Thomas Hall says:

      But what was the NIa thing? Is it just that she’s a woman in a men’s match? That’s been done, multiple times now and isn’t all that interesting.

      The Shane match is a mixture of a bunch of stuff, but it was much more having to accept that Shane, with his red face that looked like his head was going to explode at the drop of a hat, was able to hang with the Bar, who have been to war with better teams like the Usos and the New Day. It’s far too beyond the realistic style that most of Smackdown offers and that’s too much.

  11. Jay H says:

    I think a D+ is a little unfair just based off the length of the Show. To me the Royal Rumble delivered and they had the right people (Seth & Becky) win to move onto Mania. Plus the undercard was pretty solid as well.

Leave a Reply to Mike M. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.