Super ShowDown 2020: What Else Is There To Say?

You may also like...

34 Responses

  1. NightShiftLoser says:

    Bayley has cleaned out the Smackdown division, and needs a challenger. There’s a story to be told with Lacey, and Sasha v Bayley could work, as rushed as it would be, but what if Belair shows up at the Chamber and goes for the belt? It’s new, at least.

  2. Dragon says:

    I just grow frustrated with fans today and how entitled they feel they should be. It’s ok to voice your displeasure at something but when you start booking for WWE from your mom’s basement and blow a gasket when things aren’t “booked” the way you want, you throw a tantrum. Ultimate Warrior was my favorite wrestler and I believed he should have gotten over everyone. When the older Sgt. Slaughter ended his title reign, I didn’t cry, run to mommy’s tit and threaten to quit watching. I just hated Slaughter more and actually wanted to see Hogan beat him even though I wasn’t a Hogan fan. My point is, I didn’t agree with that match outcome but I didn’t threaten to stop viewing. Just state your opinion and move on. No need to have a meltdown. That is a big difference between todays fans and Golden/Attitude Era fans. Just take it easy.

    • Lian Fenech says:

      Everyone just stop overrreacting Fiend will come again it wasn’t like he lost to Curt Hawnkins in 10 secs He lost to someone while older has an incredible resamue and can beat anyone at any time and it’s believeable But since everyone seems to think this is the end of Wrestling as we know it By that logic Riccachort should never be allowed to challenge for the WWEChampionship again. Look just caim down everyone and see how this follows up.

  3. Jay H says:

    The overreaction today has been hilarious. I mean I was surprised Goldberg won the Universal Title but I’m also not that pissed about it or angry enough to stop watching or cancel my Subscription. Also can we stop saying people were buried? Nobody knows what that means anymore if they ever did.

  4. Con says:

    Goldberg is old as hell but he’s infinitely better than The Fiend, which is the sort of crap you’d be embarrassed to have someone catch you watching. Bray Wyatt is one of the worst characters in wrestling history and has no business with the top title. He absolutely stinks and would have had a way more boring match with Reigns than the fun Goldberg sprint we’re going to get.

    Watching The Fiend marks wet their pants all over the internet has been almost as entertaining as seeing him be squashed. The guy just stinks.

    I also don’t get why people act angry or surprised about this booking. It is what it is. WWE has proven time and again that they are fundamentally broken. They can’t create stars. The last meaningful names they created were in 2005. So they’re always going to go back to the nostalgia well. They have nothing else. So it’ll just be slow decline forever as two million people sit and rot in the performance centre because they signed mark contracts to stop they working anywhere else.

    • Luke H. Davis says:

      Aside from Goldberg being old as hell, there’s the believability factor going out the window. After Fiend not only beat Rollins for the belt, but even before that going into Hell in the Cell and taking the chairs and stomps and everything thrown at him that would not keep him down…and then a 53-year old man can spear him four time and execute a weak jackhammer and win the title? Same crap like we’re supposed to believe that Shane O’Mac is able to go tow to toe with Undertaker, Styles, etc., Mania after Mania. The realism is missing. Completely.

  5. TEW says:

    Goldberg Better hold the belt until his son is on the main roster

  6. MikeA says:

    Ok first things first for all those that are disappointed in the show. Say what you want but Wyatt does not need the title.
    Back in the 70s and 80s the title was HUGE. To be a champion meant something. Bruno held the title for 7 years. Why because he Drew Hogan drew as well
    Fast forward to the 90s and the world title felt like a hot potato People were winning it just to hand it over to the next guy.

    Remember when I a certain Skyscraper came to wwe in 1990.as an undertaker. Remember his first mania match was against jimmy Snuka. Like a vegetable that was a squash until he met Kane in 98. His title reigns were also nothing to write home about He dropped the title sometimes just as fast as he won it WHY. Because unlike ric flair or Austin or Hogan or Rock His Gimmick is not centered around a championship but centered around getting a certain emotion out of the audience.
    Randy Orton at almost 40 is bored to tears. Why. Because when you give a man everything too soon will he get up the next day and go to work.
    At the end of the day Vince wants what he wants. Joe is cool. He works his tail off and always gets a good match out of someone And he is higher on the marquee than Rotundas son. I know people don’t want to Bo lieve that but in the words of Angle it’s true
    Have they made mistakes with Wyatt Absolutely. Can they absolve themselves of the train wreck match with cena at 30. Maybe. It all depends on creatives ability for Wyatt to attack cena on his own catchphrase. Hustle loyalty and respect. Hey john how can you call yourself loyal when you are never around Personally I see a fun build and a match at mania where Cena will do favors and jump start Wyatt to the moon

    • BestSportsEntertainer says:

      Everyone keeps saying Wyatt doesn’t need the title.

      Then why did he win the title and keep it 4 months?

      • MikeA says:

        Well because he was with talent that through his creative work made for good stories.
        At the end of the day when taker and Wyatt go to the mythical hall of fame. Will you remember the title reigns or the stories generated from their creative work as a performer
        The product is heavily over scripted but performers like Wyatt and taker just don’t come around every day

        • BestSportsEntertainer says:

          He was only champion because he was with talent that he could tell good stories with? That makes no sense. He can’t tell good stories with Cena or Reigns?

          If Wyatt doesn’t need the championship, he shouldn’t have won the championship.

  7. Lian Fenech says:

    As disapointed as i am for the Fiend he doesn’t scream Wrestlemaina main eventer I would have liked to have him retain though so Cena could have broken Ric Flairs record at Wrestlemaina.

  8. Dragon says:

    It could be more mind games from the Fiend. The way he just popped up after they can play it that he let Goldberg win so he could go on to take down a legend like Cena at Mania. Why don’t you millenials quit whining and let the story play out. The young guys don’t ALWAYS have to be put over.

    • Ted says:

      Why are you yelling at clouds here? Also yes 99% of the time they do.

      • Dragon says:

        WTF are clouds? And explain why they do? So Richochet should have went over Brock? Give your head a shake.

        • Stone Cold Tea says:

          No one said Ricochet should have gone over Brock. Dont make false arguments to back up your point. I can get over Ricochet been squashed by Brock as he doesnt pose a threat to him.

          They did this before to KO with Goldberg and it took a lot of steam out of the match at ‘Mania.

          If they wanted Goldberg vs Reigns that could have been done without the title. Doing Wyatt vs Reigns as the Main Event would have set a precedent for Smackdown.

          Goldberg is the first ever WWE HOF to have won the WWE title after he has been inducted. Theres a reason for that. It’s stupid.

          • MikeA says:

            Again we think we hold the keys we buy the network we invest our time in the product but the ONLY time we really had a say in the direction of stories is with CM Punk Bryan and yes Wyatt
            Wyatt at least to me is this generations Jake Roberts. Yes he listens but you can Tell a lot of his overall character is Him a lot like punk and Bryan
            I don’t think reigns and Goldberg will main event I think drew and Brock will. As much as they wanted that woman’s main event for the mainstream rub. I think they learned their lesson from last year and want to give the spot to someone that needs it
            You can’t call it a push unless you are actually pushed forward

            If it was Wyatt and reigns. We know who would win and I’m sorry I’m still trying to get that image out of my head of those bugs on the mat in Orlando. And by chance let’s suppose that Wyatt beat Orton clean
            Rotunda: hey Vince what’s my next program
            Vince. You are going to drop the title to jinder mahal in Chicago because we need a figurehead for the wwe network in India
            Wyatt that just makes me sad

            Again we invest but are not in control

          • MikeA says:

            And at least Wyatt and Taker got title reigns Roberts(I know I know he was in Hogan’s era) never got a wwe title reign and I would have loved to see his feud with Rude be elevated by having the belt up for grabs. Same with savage

        • BestSportsEntertainer says:

          “WTF are clouds?”

          Maybe Fiend actually lost on purpose.

          Jesus Christ you’re a gold mine lol

  9. Sebastian Howard says:

    I think they had built the Fiend up enough to be a big enough deal for mania, he had beaten Rollins, Bryan and Miz and looked like a complete monster with his no selling. Like from a story standpoint it looked like no one could beat him and had he beaten Goldberg he would’ve looked like even bigger of a deal going into mania (not to mention that they’ve done tons of merch on him and the WWE 2k20 videogame was completely based around him). Him losing to Goldberg just completely cuts out his legs and I don’t think Reigns winning from Goldberg is going to be as big of a deal as him finally conquering the Fiend would’ve been. But whatever, I get that you’re talking from WWE’s pov.

  10. Stone Cold Tea says:

    What a joke. I’m done.

  11. Dragon says:

    The Fiend doesn’t need the title. He is a character much like the Undertaker. And unfortunately, I do agree, the Fiend is not a WM main event style, he should be used like an attraction. John Cena vs Fiend sounds much better than Roman.

  12. Sebastian Howard says:

    Why would I want to see a WM match between AJ/Taker when Taker just buried AJ clean when AJ wasn’t even tired or hurt?

    • Thomas Hall says:

      Uh, because it’s WRESTLEMANIA! That makes up for everything that has ever happened in the history of the world!

    • Jerichoholic94 says:

      “AJ didn’t prepare for the Undertaker who was not even supposed to be in the match at all and at Wrestlemania he will be fully prepared knowing that he is facing him. “ edit: there’s certain superstars that could never be buried. AJ is one

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.